Also, why are so many tech companies adopting names that are impossible to search for because they are so generic?
Google -> Alphabet
Facebook -> Meta & Threads
Twitter -> X
Are they trying to deliberately obfuscate something?
@wendyg @FediThing @sjvn I'd blame Clear Channel (aka iHeartRadio) for it first. They rebranded to try and bury their well deserved reputation as monopolists that ruined local terrestrial radio.
Much like how Facebook is trying to hide behind the "meta" name
@FediThing @sjvn I'm pretty sure that their marketing might is (or will be) enough to make it hard to search for the actual alphabet soon.
(see also the NavBoost leaks from Google. TL;DR a human handpicks what results are actually "important")
Musk has this weird thing for the letter X. I'm not going to call it a fetish, that would be irresponsible and also border on libel. But you can certainly tell which episodes of Sesame Street were his favorites. Frankly, I'm amazed he didn't call Tesla 'DriveX' or something.
How apropos that he's the X of so many women.
@sjvn reposting with Alt Text:
Dear copy editors, if Meta and X are Facebook and Twitter to the Supreme Court, that's good enough for me, and it should be good enough for you.
Exactly… no way to fool us.
@sjvn I consider Twitter dead and gone, and may X soon join it. The rename doesn't precisely delineate when the sale and enshittification started, but it'll do.
But I can respect the reasoning in this case, given the whole "past actions" and what they were called *then*.