Texas woman arrested for allegedly attempting to drown 3-year-old Palestinian Muslim child in possible hate crime

https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/18630049

Texas woman arrested for allegedly attempting to drown 3-year-old Palestinian Muslim child in possible hate crime - SDF Chatter

Wow. Made it 42 years and thought “I need to murder a child”

To be fair, it was a toddler.

/s in case that wasn’t obvious.

Publishers have to use the walking on eggshells language even when it’s obvious what happened because of libel laws. You’re not guilty until convicted in a court of law. Until that point, everything is allegedly, possibly, appears to be.
What Is Libel?

What is libel and what are some examples? Here's everything you need to know about this First Amendment topic.

Freedom Forum

I know. I already addressed that. That’s not where my issue is. My issue is they’re not only saying allegedly but also a possible hate crime when it is clearly a hate crime.

Instead after looking more, it looks like that’s because the DA has unofficially chosen not to prosecute it as a hate crime for whatever baffling reason. A month after the event and they’ve not filed charges for a hate crime. It doesn’t take a month to figure out whether a white person fighting with a Muslim in a headscarf about being American, then attacking their children and beating them with the scarf, constitutes a hate crime.

So instead it makes it look like a prosecutor that doesn’t want to prosecute a seemingly slam dunk hate crime as a hate crime, for whatever reason.