cafkafkas yes, the two genders, humans and engineers
I’m so tired of humanism I’m so tired of humanism I’m so tired of humanism I’m so tired of humanism I’m so tired of humanism I’m so tired of humanism I’m so tired of humanism I’m so tired of humanism I’m so tired of humanism I’m so tired of humanism I’m so tired of humanism I’m so tired of humanism I’m so tired of humanism I’m so tired of humanism I’m so tired of humanism I’m so tired of humanism I’m so tired of humanism I’m so tired of humanism I’m so tired of humanism I’m so tired of humanism I’m so tired of humanism I’m so tired of humanism I’m so tired of humanism I’m so tired of humanism I’m so tired of humanism
i think good things are human and bad things aren’t human wonder why I would human exceptionalism as a human hmmm 
wonder wonder wonder
wonder wonder wonderit’s almost like I’m defining myself as being inherently correct
it’s so cool how with this human thing I can dehumanize stuff and it’s okay to not treat things that aren’t human well, or treat it not well to promote human, which I have defined to be good by virtue of being human
it’s totally not a giant flaw in my whole model that being able to dehumanize things is literally one of the most fundamental tools used to commit atrocities and remove peoples rights
sure wonder how such a view could originate from catholicism, like hmmmm sure wonder why it’s useful to be able to dehumanize people, hmm, totally not just a giant sore on philosophy that’s easily exploitable by anyone looking to do a lil facism or w/e
god I wish anyone gave a shit about anithumanism it’s so cool
⛧-440729 [sophie raven]@cafkafk now basically do
s/human/person/g and it's a pretty good explanation of why this one is not a person
@sophie this goes so hard 
Not a Spring Onion
Chirayu 
@cafkafk in the Anthropocene, there are no disinterested observers; there are only participants
- Sarah Urist Green