Steve Troughton-Smith"We have a number of Apple issues. I find them very serious, I was very surprised that we would have such suspicions of Apple being noncompliant”
"This is not what we expected of such a company”
https://mastodon.social/@macrumors/112640420132181098
Paraphrased: we're not just mad, but we're also disappointed 😛
Me too, EU. Me too.
From later in the interview, specifically re questions on Apple’s Core Technology Fee:
“We have a toolbox of fines, of doubling fines, of potential breakup of companies”
"We have a very strong toolbox to ‘punish’”
…
"I expected [noncompliance] cases… I'm a bit surprised we have so many cases, so soon, and with more in the pipeline”
John Gruber@stroughtonsmith Good luck to the EU breaking up a US company.
@gruber the part that's in the US can stay in the US, but there are some big parts that live in the EU — like the iTunes Store, and Apple's consumer apps. That makes the App Store infrastructure itself a big, juicy EU-based target that would make actual sense to go after, since that's the part of Apple that’s blatantly breaking the laws anyway
Nate Vack 🍴@stroughtonsmith @gruber "Platform owners cannot control content distribution in the EU" seems like it's the intent of the DMA
One way of enforcing it would be to permit *only* third-party app stores in the EU, and sharply limit vendor-installed software.
Safari and Mail and Messages could be installed from an App Store, just like Chrome and WhatsApp. *Should* they, even if it makes the platform technically worse? I don't know.