It seems Vox is in the business of antisemitic tropes now.

A challenge to my readers, let's find and point out all the antisemitic statements and innuendos in this piece about Jerry Seinfield. Whether you like Seinfeld, or agree with Seinfeld is another story, and not what we're discussing.

https://www.vox.com/culture/354953/jerry-seinfeld-controversy-backlash

BTW, I wasn't looking for antisemitism. Google News suggested this article about Seinfeld to me, and reading it was a shock.

#antisemitism #Vox #VoxNews #AntisemitismInMedia

What’s the deal with Jerry Seinfeld?

The comedian has made headlines with recent comments on anti-war protesters and political correctness.

Vox

@serge "criticism Seinfeld has frequently reframed as antisemitic".

It's amazing how no attempt is made to even consider that a Jew stating they face antisemitism is telling the truth. It is self-evident that they are just reacting to "criticism" that they have "reframed" as antisemitism. Hard to imagine this rhetoric from Vox if a member of a different minority group had claimed that they faced discrimination or bigotry.

@benkap @serge
This isn't antisemitism. It's something different -"no enemies to the left." That's a much bigger problem on the left, elsewhere shielding from criticism not just antisemites but also partisans of "progressive" dictators in Russia, China, etc etc.
This dishonest article (note the shell game between "political correctness" & "politics" and the misrepresentation of the Julia Louis-Dreyfus quote) makes no argument that Seinfeld's ideas are wrong, only that they are out of fashion.

@BenRossTransit

I believe it can be both/multiple things.

It is extremely dishonest and meant to discredit Seinfeld or anyone who complains about anitisemitism and also "no enemies to the left." at the same time.

@benkap

@serge @benkap I think it's necessary to distinguish between actual antisemitism and covering up or tolerating antisemitism.
Otherwise you get tangled in arguments about whether something is antisemitic when it's clearly objectionable whether or not it's antisemitic.
Example: PSL & ANSWER which support not just Hamas but also govts of Venezuela, North Korea & China. Their wish to see Israel destroyed seems more geopolitical than antisemitic.

@BenRossTransit

I understand your perspective. What leads you such a different conclusion than me in regards to it being not antisemitism?

For me the targeting of a Jew, the dismissal and ridicule of his experience, etc. all point to antisemitism.

You don't see it that way?

@benkap

@serge @benkap They may have antisemitic attitudes but what I see is conformity to a milieu that tolerates antisemitism.

More generally, my issue is with the current concept of "allyship" - deference to oppressed groups (in practice usually their loudest & most extreme members) - which is a big part of the problem. Jews don't get to decide what's antisemitic by ourselves, others can disagree. The better approach is solidarity - we support each other in support of common interests & beliefs. 1/2

@serge @benkap In that view, the fight against antisemitism is one part of a broader struggle for democracy and human rights. Obviously we as Jews have a special concern with it, but the message to our allies is that antisemitism is just one manifestation of a bigger trend that threatens them too. 2/2

@BenRossTransit

> They may have antisemitic attitudes but what I see is conformity to a milieu that tolerates antisemitism.

They're using antisemitic tropes.

> Jews don't get to decide what's antisemitic by ourselves, others can disagree.

This disempowerment of Jews to say we don't get to decide what is and isn't hate to us is something I find gross and disgusting.

> In that view, the fight against antisemitism is one part of a broader struggle for democracy and human rights.

I'm not interested in engaging with someone who will de-center antisemitism in a conversation about antisemitism.

@benkap

@serge @benkap
> This disempowerment of Jews to say we don't get to decide what is and isn't hate to us is something I find gross and disgusting.

We can certainly make our own conclusions about what is antisemitic. But other people don't have to agree with our conclusions unless we can prove them. Just as we don't have to accept Louis Farrakhan's views about what is racist.

***

It's much easier to combat social acceptance of hate than flat-out hate. So let's try to figure out which is which.

@benkap @serge honestly, it is not that uncommon for people who consider themselves to be on the left to team up and declare that some racist thing they said or did was not racist, that painting it as such is an overreaction, and typically an appeal to the fact that they are leftists and thus must be decent people. (This is because doing racist things is often conflated with being a racist.)

So yeah… It is definitely the case that Jews are rarely believed when we call out antisemitism, but it is not unique, it is an experience shared with a lot of BIPOC.