YouTube is experimenting with server-side ads
YouTube is experimenting with server-side ads
Friends, for now, my suggestion to you is to use privacy-friendly alternative frontends instead of the official Youtube client.
https://github.com/mendel5/alternative-front-ends?tab=readme-ov-file#youtube
Oh no, please.
Will uBlock still work or will that also break when/if this gets added?
I doubt itโll be impossible as Google will be required by many laws around the world to make it clear if something is an advert, especially in the EU. So there will be a mechanism to know if something in the stream is an advert or not.
Adblockers should be able to adapt but I do think SponsorBlock might be stuffed if users are seeing adverts at different times in the stream.
Bad idea. People would get a negative Pavlovian reaction to puppies after a while.
Imagine walking down the street, seeing a puppy and immediately getting annoyed! Thatโs no way to live, man! ๐
Itโs more complicated, but you can still use crowd-sourcing to recognize the ads. Then use an algo to analyze the ad, frame by frame, and reject that when it shows up.
Itโll take a bit of time, but their strategy isnโt going to last. Itโs โarms-raceโ style escalation on a digital front. Eventually, the crowd sourcing will be replaced by AI/ML tools. Ad companies, like google, will always try to fight back, but open-source will always respond. You canโt beat nerds that are intelligent and passionate about not getting fucked.
When programmers with ADHD/Autism get interrupted from a fixation (like a video), suppressing that interruption, even if unproductive or unimportant, becomes their new fixation.
Iโve been guilty of this many times, for better or worse.
I feel personally attacked by this comment.
I spent like 8 hours yesterday figuring out how to install viewtube on my NAS because I got the YouTube Adblock warning on my iPad.
Reminds me of this post: https://lemmy.world/post/16500440
Correct. 65% of all human internet traffic is unmodified Chrome.
When Firefox was slow, Internet Explorer was clunky and didnโt render anything correctly, and scrappy upstart with a โDonโt be evilโ slogan and great search engine Google came out with a new fast, memory efficient web browser, all us nerds ran out and told everyone โlook! The internet doesnโt suck anymore! Use Chrome!โ We were all amazed that we could have like 5 tabs open on our PCs with a whole gigabyte of RAM.
The normies echoed this through time, never unchanging - โmy kid says โChromeโ is the good oneโ. Even when sites started breaking when viewed in other browsersโฆdidnโt we just finish fighting this โstandardsโ war? Isnโt this what we destroyed Internet Explorer for?
If itโs part of the video now, doesnโt that mean we can just fast forward through it?
Because if itโs something explicit in the stream, then ad blockers will just look for that and weโre back to where we are currently.
I guess they could prevent you from doing that by:
If youโre degoogling, then just do that instead of freeloading on google services and complaining that they either have to monetize your data or shove ads down your throat.
Find a paid service free of any of that. There are multiple out there.