AnneTheWriter@leberschnitzel @Infoseepage @Z_Zed_Zed
One problem lies in the fact that humans can not always discern where the line exists between "plagiarism" and "new images/text generated with AI."
Unless every user checks every image to compare it to known existing images (few if any #AI users do this) and see how much of it was "substantively altered" from an existing protected image (ditto for text), then they could easily be violating copyright unwittingly-- because AI doesn't respect #copyright, nor can its work be copyrighted.
A user can also be given generated material by an AI program, which was already generated for someone else, and not realize it. They can get material already published elsewhere (which is often published deceptively under a human name).
Basically, the problem is that #AIgenerated material is currently a confusing quagmire. It's no wonder #AIArt so quickly despised and reported.
Zeugs