BonesOfTheMoonSovcit made her own license plate out of cardboard.
She left off her Facebook disclaimer.
chemical_cutthroatYou know, I’m really rooting for these people. They are like Mario 64 speed runners looking for the new speed butt jump glitch. One of them might actually find something worthwhile.
HarkMahlbergThey're gonna BLJ into a cell block.
I agree - I’m just waiting for it to get upheld by the Supreme Court before I get my cardboard license plates too lol
Gradually_AdjustingThis can be viewed as soft evidence that we’re not in a simulation. Speedrunners achieve their goals, and do not waste time on unnecessary dialogue.
henfredemarsIf you say the magic words, laws don’t apply.
Yeah well your spouse is now my spouse, oogity boogity I said the magic words. Also gimme all your shoes.
Granted. You are now on the hook for her child support payments for my raising her kids.
The one thing a sovcit can never do.
You didn’t capitalize anything so I’m RUBBER and you’re GLUE. It is now your RESPONSIBILITY as I have claimed my RIGHTS.
Where’s your red ink thumbprint?
Blast!
You didn’t use EMOJIS so payment in the FORM of $1M upfront, THEN the usual PAYMENTS 😘🤣🤔🤑💥🦶🐢
I think that’s two things: raised kids, and paying child support.
I believe the technical term is “no takesie backsies”.
Now, the whole thing is void, you fool!
No, it has to be “NO TAKESIE BACKSIES, WITHOUT PREJUDICE”. Now it’s all mine!
Fuck! Ya got me.
“natural born” is part of the qualification to be President of the United States in the constitution.
“Under God” is a clause that was officially added to the pledge of allegiance in the 1950s. The pledge of allegiance doesn’t really have much legal significance at all in the United States, even if it is recited daily in schools.
“Natural born woman” sounds a lot like an Aretha Franklin hit.
after reading about people who don’t understand law I can only say YOU MAKE ME FEEL LIKE less of a dumbass. (not you, mkwt, all you did was put Aretha in my head which is never a bad thing, also FREEEEeeeeeWAY OF LOVE)
wander1236You can’t own my house if I don’t own a house. Checkmate liberal
Flying SquidThat “may” is doing some real heavy lifting…
She of course teaches a “donation based” class on Telegram about how you too can be tased and dragged out of your car.
Great! I was feeling too sane and reasonable anyway.
DominusOfMegadeusWho isn’t, really?
Steal WoolIm really glad I wasn’t in the middle of taking a sip of something when I read this!
I don't see a "may," what am I missing?
Sixth word in the post.
I Declare and Decree that I Am ...
Am I looking at a different image than you are?
You must be, because the image OP posted to make this thread is not that one.
I wonder if @BonesOfTheMoon initially posted the image I see, then federation sync happened to fedia.io, then OP changed the link to a different image, and fedia.io didn't update it?
I don’t know. This is the image:
Yeah, if I do "open original URL" and go over and look at the post at lemmy.world, I see the image you are seeing.
I've noticed other federation missteps with votes, just trying to pay attention to these little weirdnesses that are emergent properties of a decentralized social media environment.
I changed the image, I posted the wrong one at first.
I put up the wrong photo at first.
Study these codes written by the government, they give you rights; not those codes written by the government, they don’t give you any rights.
This one shocked me. There's actual punctuation this time. Crazy.
Ah yes, let’s reference all of the laws, for which you don’t ascribe, to justify you not ascribing to those laws.
This is what gets me every time. They quote US laws, but at the same time claim they are not subject to any US laws. How do they decide what laws apply and what laws don’t?
norbertHow do they decide what laws apply and what laws don't?
The same way religions do, willy-nilly.
“All Rights Reserved” being displayed is optional, but usually is done if the copyright holder suspects people may unwittingly infringe the reserved rights of their creative work. This person made their’s massive for a reason, because damn that’s a cool list of codes. Anyone got a torrent?
What’s really interesting to me is how much time they invest in this stuff. It’s not exactly interesting. And there’s no tangible result for them, other than ending up in court. They do end up having to pay tax or whatever it is they’re trying to dodge.
What do they get out of it?
These sovcits obsessed with sticking to the DMV just seem like flat earthers - there’s no actual point to the obsession.
Yeah, but in exchange for their $500 fine, they get the “moral victory”, they get to feel as persecuted as they want to be (read: “aren’t”), and they get a cool story to share with mayonnaise people on their divorced middle-aged white guy fascist gunnut forums. We all have our hobbies. Mine is Rubik’s Cubes.
Mayonnaise people 😅
Store-brand mayonnaise people, not Hellmann’s people. And definitely not Miracle Whip people…they’re the polar opposite of zesty. They are the human equivalent of a fifth grade field trip to the corrugated cardboard factory.
Imagine how much fun they would be having with a wizard character in D&D instead of trying to cast spells through the court system.
This makes me think of people that add a “copyright” notice at the end of every comment
Art is mine do not steal!
“I do not claim ownership of the song used in this video.”
Good, because you’d be a lunatic if you did, JazzMasterZero, but it doesn’t change the fact that you are still using someone else’s art in your monetized and shittily-edited dog trick compilation video.
Ugh the ones with the “anti-AI” “licensing”? I honestly don’t know how they expect that to accomplish anything, other than look like a pretentious idiot.
Any better idea how to prevent scraping or, at least, be able to fight it after the fact?
Don’t post on a third party site.
That’s like saying “If you don’t want corporations to steal your sourcecode, just don’t publish it.” That’s just not the right conclusion to come to.
I think it should be absolutely possible to communicate with other people in the open while still maintaining some kind of control over your creation.
I agree it’s not great for public discourse, but you are subject to the whims of the third party’s TOS. You can still publish it, but have to make your own site or pick a third party that won’t sell you out.
That’s not how copyright works. In my example: Publishing code on GitHub still means that code remains under whatever license I put on it, no matter how GitHub feels about that. They can not go ahead and sell my little helper library to Sony for use in their PlayStation OS update to make a buck. If I put it under GPL e.g., Sony would still have to stick to that.
Same goes for posting on a public Lemmy instance. I publish content, I can limit it’s usage. The only thing the instance could do about that is remove my content if their usage of it is in conflict with whatever limitations I put on it.
Should, in some form of future, courts rule that those LLM generating companies can’t just use everything they get their hands on as they please, the poison pill is in their models. That’s why that thing matters now. Could it be done more elegantly than a persistent footer? Certainly. Right now though? I don’t see it.
A footnote isn’t going to stop anyone from scraping comments. That’s just reality.
I agree, that’s how it should work. GitHub as a third party probably had better TOS than most, and would face more uproar if they changed it. But they are not a social media site.
But for regular social media posting, Facebook, Twitter, etc, there is no fighting against their TOS other than abstinence. You can object in writing with one of those footers, but nobody in charge is going to read it or honor it. It will be shoveled into the AI along with everything else. Your only recourse will be an expensive legal fight, and it would be difficult to prove any particular post was in the AI or not. It’s unproven legal ground to say giving a post to an AI for training even qualifies as a “copy” under copyright, or what notification qualifies to exempt your content.
For the US: you already have a copyright on everything you write. Adding CC-BY-NC grants others the right to republish it for non-commercial use, it does not remove any rights at all.
Yes, that is how that works, correct. CC-BY-NC specifically prevents commercial use and as far as I see that, that’s the point of those people that add that footer to their posts.
No, that’s not how it works. Commercial use is already prohibited by default. They are adding no new prohibitions. They are allowing use that is not allowed by default.
Not everywhere is the US. It’s not that simple here.
Yes, that’s why I wrote specifically for the US. Where many prominent AI companies are.