Here's today's academic hot take. The way we run conferences is absolutely wild. Can you imagine if a company had 100% employee turnover every year and all they had to rely on was (if you're lucky) some documentation, or having to reach out to the person who previously had your job which you then feel bad about because they don't work there anymore?

Also the fact that anyone thinks professors should be event planners.

This hot take is brought to you by someone who co-chaired two different conferences last year. And now that I think I actually kind of know how to do it, I probably never will again. (Or it will be in like 10 years when somehow I get talked in to CHI. Probably not though.)

I will say that the larger conference (~800 people) had a couple of paid helpers who knew what they were doing re: components of the event planning stuff. The smaller (< 100) literally had me picking out the food.

I'll note that one partial solution to part of this problem is staggered positions, which some conferences do for all or some organizing positions. But it is a HUGE ask for someone to do these things for more than one year in a row. (So I understand when people declined when I tried to make this happen.) Like yes, professional service is sometimes officially part of academics' jobs, but it's not like other things stop. i.e., you don't get a teaching release for chairing a conference.

@cfiesler I've thought for a little while that organisations like ACM and IEEE should have a permanent staff of professional conference organisers.

Academic conference costs are completely out of control and part of this is because much of the negotiation power is held by the venues. The accounts I saw for one ACM conference had $50/person for lunch. The lunch was an incredibly mediocre buffet and you could eat much better for half the price in dozens of restaurants within a 10-minute walk of the venue. The first conferences I went to didn't cater lunch, they just gave people a couple of hours to go and find somewhere to eat, which led to a load of interesting conversations as you found a group to eat with and went somewhere nice.

The cost of renting the AV equipment is often higher than the cost of buying it outright.

Is it cheaper to not cater and not have the venue provide AV? No, because if you don't use their catering they charge you more. If you use your own AV equipment then it must be operated by members of the union (which is often an organisation local to a single hotel and controlled by the hotel management) and the union rates are so high that it isn't worth it.

If you're a single conference, negotiating a better deal is hard. But if you're the ACM, organising over a thousand conferences every year, you're in a really good position to negotiate with a hotel chain. If ACM goes to Marriott or Hilton and says 'we want a good deal for our conferences, we can guarantee an average of 200 people staying in your hotels every day as a result of our choosing you as our conference hosting partner', what do you think the reaction would be? If ACM then has a handful of people who can arrange the AV and ensure that there's a consistent presenter experience and recordings make it into the ACM DL immediately, that would be a huge win.

Let academics focus on the content of the conference, no on the logistics.

@david_chisnall ACM does negotiate with the venues.
@cfiesler Do they negotiate as ACM, or as some ACM conference? I can't believe that the prices I've seen in the financial reports for conference are the rates that you'd get as an organisation that runs hundreds of conferences a year. I've been quoted similar rates as an individual organising a one-off event.
@david_chisnall ACM negotiates for each conference; I’m not sure about the for specifics beyond that.