https://daringfireball.net/linked/2024/04/19/meta-pay-only-eu
@daringfireball “Because it’s always been free-of-charge, people (not unreasonably!) now think it ought to forever remain free-of-charge.”
One other, slightly more reasonable hypothesis is that Facebook had this text on their *frontpage*:
“
Sign Up
It’s free, and always will be.
“
@daringfireball or they could offer a free-with-non-targeted ads version that is more limited. For example, they might have a strictly linear timeline with just the people you follow on it.
Oh, wait - that should be the paid tier.
@tomrossberlin @daringfireball Here is the problem with your argument my friend. Can you show me the part of Apple's agreement where it limits these restrictions to:
“giants having 45 million+ active local users. Other gatekeeper criteria include a turnover of €7.5 billion+ in the last three financial years and a market capitalization that exceeds €75BN"?
From my read, all apps on the App Store must follow these guidelines, unlike the EU's restrictions.
@shadash Don’t put words into my mouth and then sarcastically ask me to prove those. Not a good look on you.
My screenshot was in response to the claim that Facebook and Apple each present the same choice to the user. Facebook’s is a trade-off, while Apple’s has no negative consequences.
The size of the company is a separate matter. Apple only charges 15 % to small devs, for example. And in politics, many ask for billionaire taxes. Why do you think it’s unfair to be tougher on large companies?