I'm an abandonware radicalist; not only should abandoned software have its source released, abandoned hardware should be opened up to development to stop it being ewaste.

@lofty Nevermind abandoned software and hardware, I'm of the view that purchasing software or hardware should include the tools necessary to control every bit of data in every RAM and register and the documentation necessary to do so.

I understand that it's much easier to make the abandonware argument though, and I also support that. It'd be a nice compromise if companies had to submit documentation and programming tools to some kind of agency that timed the public release for a few years after the launch date. That way, millions of products wouldn't become e-waste if a company is suddenly bought out or goes bankrupt.

@chargedhex I mean, I think so too, but points at yuzu the powers that be have other ideas.
@lofty @chargedhex Yuzu _did_ do something illegal. They made money of offering what they did, while people used it with ROMs still sold. Seriously. I mean, if the Switch was standardized or something like that, Nintendo would not be able to develop stuff. I mean, screw Nintendo, but you go make an innovative producer of stuff if you think you can do better. Game studios go bankrupt all the time, so I'm not sure if hedging should be outlawed.