radicalautonomyMar 25, 2024

Teacher who resigned after her OnlyFans page was discovered says new employer fired her for violating social media policy

https://lemmy.world/post/13518920

Teacher who resigned after her OnlyFans page was discovered says new employer fired her for violating social media policy - Lemmy.World

Had to supplement her $42,000 per year teacher salary with OF and made nearly $1 million in six months (almost 50 times as her salary) before the school caught wind of it and forced her to resign. Got a new job out of education and was fired five days later when they discovered news articles about her.

Show threadji59Mar 25, 2024

They claim that I violated their social media policy, but will not respond to me with how I violated it.

WTH is social media policy? Is it written somewhere that employees can't have OF? (And also who found her on OF and snitch on her?)

Show threadMaalusMar 25, 2024
It’s probably some bullshit like “your social media presence cannot hurt the company” - i.e. if someone is a full on Nazi, clients could look them up and it being a controversy. But now it’s applied to OF by puritans.
Show threadAdmiralShatMar 25, 2024
This, at its core, is why I agree with the right for this company to have this policy. I wouldn’t want to be legally forced to employ and pay a Nazi and be seen associating with said Nazi, therefore I have to agree to the rights of others to do the same, even if I don’t agree with their reasons
Show threadCuriousfurMar 25, 2024
You are equating hiring someone who makes and sells their own porn to hiring someone who subscribes to a hateful, violent ideology. They absolutely aren’t the fucking same. One is a legal adult legally providing a digital service to other legal adults, and the other is a member of a group known specifically for violence to advance racial superiority. Only one of those people does anything that could ever lead to another person being harmed or threatened, and as such only one of them should be driven out of society by any means necessary. This is not a “both sides” thing, this is discrimination against someone who has caused no harm, plain and simple.
Show threadAdmiralShatMar 25, 2024

I’m not equating shit, don’t fucking put words in my mouth. I’m not even reading the rest of that comment,

If you want your own freedoms you have to accept that others get their own feeedoms and can use them in ways you dont agree with

Show threadPatapon EnjoyerMar 25, 2024
Show threadAdmiralShatMar 25, 2024

I didn’t compare or equate anything, I just said I don’t have to agree to their reasoning to acknowledge their right

Serious reading comprehension issue

Show threadTimewornTravelerMar 26, 2024

Serious reading comprehension issue

Hi new guy in the convo doint point your guns at me just wanted to point out the irony of you saying this after openly admitting you wouldn’t even read the other person’s comment in full

Show threadAdmiralShatMar 26, 2024
Which isn’t a reading comprehension issue and isn’t irony.
Show threadTimewornTraveler
Sounds like you don’t really understand either very well then. Get off your intellectual high horse. We’re not debating the definition of irony like it’s 2003. And if you can’t see how in your case your reading comp issues don’t count but in their case they’re having some sort of personal failing then I don’t know what to tell you. Since you’re so smart why don’t you go read up on the self-serving bias so you can throw that term around later without engaging in introspection too.
Mar 26, 2024 at 10:57pmWeb
Show threadAdmiralShatMar 27, 2024

Now this is irony, actually, you’re so wrapped up in your own idea of pseudo intellectualism that when you’re challenged at all by anything you shit yourself

You need a nap? Maybe a time out?