They claim that I violated their social media policy, but will not respond to me with how I violated it.

WTH is social media policy? Is it written somewhere that employees can't have OF? (And also who found her on OF and snitch on her?)

It’s probably some bullshit like “your social media presence cannot hurt the company” - i.e. if someone is a full on Nazi, clients could look them up and it being a controversy. But now it’s applied to OF by puritans.

This, at its core, is why I agree with the right for this company to have this policy. I wouldn’t want to be legally forced to employ and pay a Nazi and be seen associating with said Nazi, therefore I have to agree to the rights of others to do the same, even if I don’t agree with their reasons

You are equating hiring someone who makes and sells their own porn to hiring someone who subscribes to a hateful, violent ideology. They absolutely aren’t the fucking same. One is a legal adult legally providing a digital service to other legal adults, and the other is a member of a group known specifically for violence to advance racial superiority. Only one of those people does anything that could ever lead to another person being harmed or threatened, and as such only one of them should be driven out of society by any means necessary. This is not a “both sides” thing, this is discrimination against someone who has caused no harm, plain and simple.

I’m not equating shit, don’t fucking put words in my mouth. I’m not even reading the rest of that comment,

If you want your own freedoms you have to accept that others get their own feeedoms and can use them in ways you dont agree with

I didn’t compare or equate anything, I just said I don’t have to agree to their reasoning to acknowledge their right

Serious reading comprehension issue

If you think they’re right to fire her for porn say they’re right for firing her for porn. Don’t say they’re right for firing her because nazis exist.

right

I think this is the issue, youre illiterate.

I’m saying they HAVE a right, not THAT they’re right.

Two different words with two different definitions

Public school system has failed miserably, because lol

And why do you think they should be equated to nazis when they exercise that right?

they didn’t equate anyone to nazis.

the only people equated were the employers, the real ones from the story, and the hypothetical ones from his comparison.

no employers were nazis nor equated to them.

Ok so now it’s the employers who made the nazi comparison. Maybe at some point we’ll get you to admit you made a dumb comparison.

That’s a different person, genius

Nobody compared anything, for the love of god

“I support companies having this right because if they didn’t I’d be forced to work with Nazis more often” is a very straightforward concept

A straightforward concept and also a wrong one. Not firing people for one thing doesn’t mean not firing people for any other thing including being a fucking Nazi.

So you’re saying we should be forced to associate with nazis? What about pedophiles? What about people who posts loli porn or people who say the N word on their twitter?

I’m saying we shouldn’t. Are you saying that teacher is any of those people?

You’re saying we shouldn’t but then saying we should be forced to interact with people we don’t like?

So who decides what’s acceptable? The government? You? Where is the line and why is it that you think I should have to associate with people who post animated pedophile porn?

Do I want the entity whose reason for existing is to decide which behaviors are acceptable and infringe people’s rightsto decide which behaviors are acceptable? Would be nice, but I like your suggestion where I get to choose.