radicalautonomyMar 25, 2024

Teacher who resigned after her OnlyFans page was discovered says new employer fired her for violating social media policy

https://lemmy.world/post/13518920

Teacher who resigned after her OnlyFans page was discovered says new employer fired her for violating social media policy - Lemmy.World

Had to supplement her $42,000 per year teacher salary with OF and made nearly $1 million in six months (almost 50 times as her salary) before the school caught wind of it and forced her to resign. Got a new job out of education and was fired five days later when they discovered news articles about her.

Show threadji59Mar 25, 2024

They claim that I violated their social media policy, but will not respond to me with how I violated it.

WTH is social media policy? Is it written somewhere that employees can't have OF? (And also who found her on OF and snitch on her?)

Show threadMaalusMar 25, 2024
It’s probably some bullshit like “your social media presence cannot hurt the company” - i.e. if someone is a full on Nazi, clients could look them up and it being a controversy. But now it’s applied to OF by puritans.
Show threadAdmiralShatMar 25, 2024
This, at its core, is why I agree with the right for this company to have this policy. I wouldn’t want to be legally forced to employ and pay a Nazi and be seen associating with said Nazi, therefore I have to agree to the rights of others to do the same, even if I don’t agree with their reasons
Show threadCuriousfurMar 25, 2024
You are equating hiring someone who makes and sells their own porn to hiring someone who subscribes to a hateful, violent ideology. They absolutely aren’t the fucking same. One is a legal adult legally providing a digital service to other legal adults, and the other is a member of a group known specifically for violence to advance racial superiority. Only one of those people does anything that could ever lead to another person being harmed or threatened, and as such only one of them should be driven out of society by any means necessary. This is not a “both sides” thing, this is discrimination against someone who has caused no harm, plain and simple.
Show threadAdmiralShatMar 25, 2024

I’m not equating shit, don’t fucking put words in my mouth. I’m not even reading the rest of that comment,

If you want your own freedoms you have to accept that others get their own feeedoms and can use them in ways you dont agree with

Show threadPatapon EnjoyerMar 25, 2024
Show threadAdmiralShatMar 25, 2024

I didn’t compare or equate anything, I just said I don’t have to agree to their reasoning to acknowledge their right

Serious reading comprehension issue

Show threadPatapon EnjoyerMar 25, 2024
If you think they’re right to fire her for porn say they’re right for firing her for porn. Don’t say they’re right for firing her because nazis exist.
Show threadAdmiralShatMar 25, 2024

right

I think this is the issue, youre illiterate.

I’m saying they HAVE a right, not THAT they’re right.

Two different words with two different definitions

Public school system has failed miserably, because lol

Show threadPatapon EnjoyerMar 25, 2024
And why do you think they should be equated to nazis when they exercise that right?
Show threadAdmiralShat

You’re the one trying to say this, not me. Im not equating anything YOU are saying that I am because you can’t read.

I’m saying people with different beliefs have the same rights and can use them according to their beliefs.

You’re incapable of understanding the whole point. If you take their right to association away because ot doesn’t align with your belif system, then what happens when a new person takes office and suddenly has a platform for taking peoples rights away?

Mar 25, 2024 at 5:12pmWeb
Show threadPatapon EnjoyerMar 25, 2024

I’m saying people with different beliefs have the same rights and can use them according to their beliefs.

That is the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard.

Show threadAdmiralShatMar 25, 2024

I’m gonna screen shot this and make a post about it, because trust me buddy, it’s not me who is dumb here

Please explain why you think either only people who believe what you believe should have rights or people who believe differently shouldn’t have as many rights or can’t use them the same as you?

Show threadPatapon EnjoyerMar 25, 2024

First tell me why you should be able to infringe on people’s rights because of your beliefs instead of generally recognized protections. You know, the same point homophobes make to not serve gay people.

Don’t work, I’m not making a comparison 😉

Show threadAdmiralShatMar 25, 2024
I literally said what someone posts to social media isn’t a protected class. I literally said that. I actually, literally said
Show threadPatapon EnjoyerMar 25, 2024
Good for you. So everyone who isn’t a protected class might as well be nazis when it comes to projections.
Show threadSchadrachMar 26, 2024

You know, the same point homophobes make to not serve gay people.

Except the cases about homophobes refusing to serve gay people aren’t about refusing to serve gay people generally - they’re about refusing to engage in speech they oppose on commission. The case with the homophobic baker wasn’t refusing to sell a gay couple a cake off the shelf - they were refusing to accept a commission to create a custom cake, and a lot of their argument was over whether or not a cake design is speech in the same way an artwork is and whether the 1st Amendment trumps anti-discrimination laws.