Critics must rescore Dragon's Dogma 2 in light of microtransactions

https://lemmy.ca/post/17946426

Critics must rescore Dragon's Dogma 2 in light of microtransactions - Lemmy.ca

Mixed feelings about that - it sounds like you can still access those features so I don’t think it really affects the base game at all. From what I remember about the first game, you had to be sparing on the waystones to start with, and it required a bit of work to get the item necessary to redo your character - so not much has really changed there. On the other hand, adding these microtransactions in the first place is a stupid idea and the publishers are shooting themselves in the foot by adding them.
The Dragon's Dogma 2 microtransactions are real and bafflingly silly, since nearly all of them can be found in the game without too much trouble

"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."

PC Gamer

Having limited access to a resource to then hook you on microtransactions is from mobile game design. It’s literally a freemium mechanic being put into an already upscaled price game.

It’s literally the most abusive and addictive way to develop a game, and you want to use that as an excuse.

I fucking hate gamers. We’ve been having this conversation since the horse Armor DLC for Oblivion yet here we fucking are.

Except having limited access to a resource is from the original game. There’s this lie being sold online that it was an intentional decision for DD2 to try and sell more microtransactions, but limited fast travel is a hallmark of the original Dragon’s Dogma. People are so quick to blind themselves to hatred that they haven’t noticed that Capcom has added completely pointless microtransactions to every one of their games for at least the past 5 years. You can drag them through the coals if you want to over that, and it’s as fair a reason to boycott Capcom games as any, but it’s not a reason to start going after games journalists.

The original game that ultimately saw success in its “Dark Arisen” release that had an eternal ferrystone.

Don’t go trying to redefine history here, I played both copies of the original.

If what I read is correct, there is a quest involving a spinx in late game that offers an eternal ferrystone. Now maybe I’ve been lied to, but it sounds pretty reasonable and would track with what was added to Dark Arisen. If you really, desperately, for whatever reason want to skip playing like 80% of the game and spend $30 to fast travel everywhere, I guess you could spend it on ferrystones? Nobody should do that though, it completely breaks the flow and atmosphere of the game, and they are meant to be a limited resource in the early game of both Dragon’s Dogma 1 and 2. You can hate that decision all you want, but don’t try to distort facts to fit your own rage. All the microtransactions are pointless and unnecessary.

Sounds like you want to change topics from your whole lies topic for some reason? Weird. Changing your defense from it being lies and a limited resource while not admitting the predatory nature of this game design. I dont care to argue your new bad faith points as you did not take the last stance fairly.

I guess if we’re changing topics, we can focus on the predatory character customization microtransaction.

Or we can go I to Capcoms recent attempts to take down mods from their old games

Plenty of problematic things to hit on here.

Have you tried to turn a circle in the capital on low settings?

Doesn’t like that topic is being changed -> changes topic.

Carefull with the Cheeto-dust there my man.

Also, can you tell me exactly where the ‘new save or character creation’ microtransaction is? I can’t seem to find it.

Also, character customisation is easily done by buying an item in game for a negligible amount of gold.

Again, calm it with the cheetodust my man.

Cringe.