The ongoing anti-trans pogrom in America continues largely unabated, and vastly under-reported. Mirroring the peculiar UK style of trans persecution, three states (and counting) are now trying to pass laws that would end state recognition of trans people under the guise of protecting women's rights. These bills would legally categorize sex based on reproductive capabilities, and would likely result in banning changes to birth certificates, driver's licenses and other forms of identification; in addition to the usual restriction of bathroom access based on assigned gender at birth clauses common in anti-trans crusader bills.

https://truthout.org/articles/gulf-south-states-advance-bills-to-end-legal-recognition-for-trans-people/

"Should these bills become law, an increasing number of states will not legally recognize transgender individuals. The implications of such legislation are profound: individuals who have long since updated their identity documents may face the reversion of those documents back to their assigned sex at birth. These state-issued identification documents could then be employed to enforce additional anti-transgender laws, including bathroom bans. Moreover, these restrictions are bound to create complications for transgender individuals who have legally updated their federal documents to align with their gender identity, as these documents would conflict with their state-issued ones."

Although it is indeed important to take what amounts to the forced outing of trans people seriously, I think far too many people are sleeping on what it actually means to end legal recognition of trans identities in our society. While this all might seem like a giant game of pretend to cisgender people laughing at fascist politicians in Red States, the simple truth is that if, legally speaking, trans people don't exist, then they cannot legally be considered the target of persecution or discrimination for their trans identity. Laws like these so called "Women's Bill of Rights" not only harm trans people psychologically, and expose them as public (and even state-sanctioned) targets for hate crimes, but they are also a very clear precursor to further acts of legal persecution designed to chase trans people from public life, justify their segregation from society, and yes quite possibly eliminate them entirely.

If you want to *legally* end trans people, one of the easiest ways to start that process is to begin by insisting that there really is no such thing as trans people at all. This is part of a historically documented process of dehumanizing, and legally "unpersoning" a target group. Once trans people don't legally exist, you can quickly and efficiently strip their civil rights; and after that part is accomplished - all bets are off. This is literally the historically recognized recipe for a pogrom; which is what trans people have been trying to tell the rest of America is what's going on here, all along.

#TransRights #Fascism #USPolitics #Pogrom

Gulf South States Advance Bills to End Legal Recognition for Trans People

Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama have introduced bills to define sex in a manner that excludes trans individuals.

Truthout

Just gonna leave this in my replies because the lib in my mentions pulled a ninja delete to make me look unreasonable - this post was in response to a reply talking about: Republicans, tories, oil oligarchs, democracy and NOT mentioning even one time "an anti-trans pogrom."

She's playing it slick now that she caught that block, but this is how it went.

@AnarchoNinaAnalyzes I think it's partly that the block straight up removes the posts when you're viewing from your own instance while logged in (thankfully), which was the issue I had when I went to look at what was happening. Because I've had this person blocked for a long time for many of the exact same reasons. As a result, I had to go view the thread from another instance to get the context.

But also my non-binary ass is sitting with you in the "There's an anti-trans pogrom" camp. We're not simply canaries in coal mines, which I think is a detrimental perspective with regard to *any* marginalised group of people.

@whatanerd Holy sh*t, you were right. I'm sorry. I swear I looked and looked, but I guess she split it off into two threads and because I was busy telling her to stop and acknowledge what the thread is ABOUT, I didn't notice. I swear to the sky this was NOT there when I looked earlier. But it is now, so I must've missed it.

https://mstdn.social/@Npars01/112138088217466937

Nicole Parsons (@[email protected])

@[email protected] So much of the public policy of Tories & Republicans can be explained as oil oligarchs using religious fundamentalism to hijack policy making. It's a religious attack on the secular belief that people should be equal under the law. They don't believe all people should have full agency & autonomy. They seek to preserve systems of semi-citizenry, government imposed poverty, and unfair social hierarchies. Workers are serfs https://www.texasmonthly.com/news-politics/billionaire-tim-dunn-runs-texas/ https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_patriarchy

Mastodon 🐘
@AnarchoNinaAnalyzes I thought for a moment it was just that my alt account's server cached it, so I was seeing it on my own, lol.
@whatanerd No, clearly I'm just emo and crying; forgot how threads worked/didn't know it was a separate thread she'd done that in.