The ongoing anti-trans pogrom in America continues largely unabated, and vastly under-reported. Mirroring the peculiar UK style of trans persecution, three states (and counting) are now trying to pass laws that would end state recognition of trans people under the guise of protecting women's rights. These bills would legally categorize sex based on reproductive capabilities, and would likely result in banning changes to birth certificates, driver's licenses and other forms of identification; in addition to the usual restriction of bathroom access based on assigned gender at birth clauses common in anti-trans crusader bills.

https://truthout.org/articles/gulf-south-states-advance-bills-to-end-legal-recognition-for-trans-people/

"Should these bills become law, an increasing number of states will not legally recognize transgender individuals. The implications of such legislation are profound: individuals who have long since updated their identity documents may face the reversion of those documents back to their assigned sex at birth. These state-issued identification documents could then be employed to enforce additional anti-transgender laws, including bathroom bans. Moreover, these restrictions are bound to create complications for transgender individuals who have legally updated their federal documents to align with their gender identity, as these documents would conflict with their state-issued ones."

Although it is indeed important to take what amounts to the forced outing of trans people seriously, I think far too many people are sleeping on what it actually means to end legal recognition of trans identities in our society. While this all might seem like a giant game of pretend to cisgender people laughing at fascist politicians in Red States, the simple truth is that if, legally speaking, trans people don't exist, then they cannot legally be considered the target of persecution or discrimination for their trans identity. Laws like these so called "Women's Bill of Rights" not only harm trans people psychologically, and expose them as public (and even state-sanctioned) targets for hate crimes, but they are also a very clear precursor to further acts of legal persecution designed to chase trans people from public life, justify their segregation from society, and yes quite possibly eliminate them entirely.

If you want to *legally* end trans people, one of the easiest ways to start that process is to begin by insisting that there really is no such thing as trans people at all. This is part of a historically documented process of dehumanizing, and legally "unpersoning" a target group. Once trans people don't legally exist, you can quickly and efficiently strip their civil rights; and after that part is accomplished - all bets are off. This is literally the historically recognized recipe for a pogrom; which is what trans people have been trying to tell the rest of America is what's going on here, all along.

#TransRights #Fascism #USPolitics #Pogrom

Gulf South States Advance Bills to End Legal Recognition for Trans People

Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama have introduced bills to define sex in a manner that excludes trans individuals.

Truthout

@AnarchoNinaAnalyzes

Anti-trans laws, along with reproduction laws, are funded by religious bigots imposing their beliefs on everyone.

Malign influence campaigns by the likes of Tim Dunn, Farris Wilks, & other oil-rich religious fundamentalists believe people have biblically prescribed roles in life.

POC as servants to economies owned & run by whites, women in permanent subservience to men, children as property of parents, the planet & democracy as theirs to fry.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complementarianism

Complementarianism - Wikipedia

@Npars01 I don't disagree with anything you said, but even in this "everyone in their place" religious right wing worldview, there is absolutely no "place" for trans people. Therefore, I do believe it's correct to describe it as an anti-trans pogrom.

I don't mind you adding additional information about the goals and motivations of the people behind this, I write about those people too fairly often. But the context here is that it's an anti-trans pogrom. Yes, it's part of something larger (specifically, American fascism and Christian nationalism), but that something larger still includes "no trans people" and there's really only *one* way to accomplish that goal.

@AnarchoNinaAnalyzes

Anti-trans laws are the "foot in the door" for a whole host of anti-democracy initiatives.

Thwart anti-trans laws now, or face an onslaught of civil rights rollbacks for everyone later.

I understand wanting to focus on anti-trans issues.

However, the preservation of LGBTQ rights, especially trans rights, means forming alliances.

Trying to build a coalition of allies means acknowledging how anti-trans laws will impact everyone's civil rights.

@AnarchoNinaAnalyzes

You are welcome to decline to seek a broader coalition to protect trans rights, and go it alone. Your choice.

Unwanted offers of a coalition with broader civil rights movements can be perceived as distasteful.

Divide & conquer is pervasive in anti-democracy movements.

@Npars01 So basically, you still don't want to talk about an anti-trans pogrom, right?

Okay well thanks and I think we're probably not gonna get along. Have a great life.

@AnarchoNinaAnalyzes

Again, your choice.

I comment on what I know: civil rights abuses.
Restrictions on access to trans medical care is a civil rights abuse.

Bathroom laws are a civil rights abuse.

Using targeted harassment campaigns on trans to get evangelicals to vote for the GOP & Tories is a civil rights abuse

Misusing school boards and public education systems to impose religious bigotry on trans is a civil rights abuse

Fear mongering about trans on Fox News is a civil rights abuse

@[email protected]

I'm not sure why it is so hard to persuade trans advocates that it is advisable to form coalitions to further their civil rights aims.

Perhaps there's a concern that trans civil rights advocacy will be subsumed into advocacy for women's rights, POC rights, pro-democracy rights, migrant rights, seniors rights etc.

All I know is there's strength in numbers.
And plugging into the funding for the advancement of civil rights is simply prudence.

But, your choice.