Wikipedia's vision is of a world in which everyone can freely share in the sum of all human knowledge. But we cannot achieve that when we are missing so much knowledge about women.

This #WomensHistoryMonth, join us in closing the gender knowledge gap on Wikipedia and across the Wikimedia projects.

#ChangeTheStats #OpenTheKnowledge

Get started: https://wikimediafoundation.org/wikipedia-needs-more-women

Wikipedia Needs More Women โ€“ Wikimedia Foundation

Wikipedia needs more women is our call for people like you to edit womenโ€™s stories, histories, and contexts onto Wikipedia.

Wikimedia Foundation

@wikimediafoundation As long as you will continue to support toxic behavior discriminating women and non binary people as editors, this will never happen. The old white male majority of editors will continue protecting itself from newcomers with a fresh mind. The results are visible in what recently happened in the French Wikipedia endangering many people (you absolutely know what I'm writing about).

You need to intervene. You need to stop this. Only then new contributors can rise and raise.

@wikimediafoundation Let me emphasize it : Your call for participation is pure victim blaming. The men don't let us edit. You pretend we do not want to edit. We want to edit, we want to contribute. But the old white cis men don't let us.
@braid @wikimediafoundation i facilitated a couple of those art+feminism wiki edit a thons a few years ago and men were overly criticizing pages we made, saying these notable women were not notable, threatening to remove their pages despite all the awards these artists and architects had won, even before the workshops were over. it was so discouraging that i don't do it anymore.

@forestine @braid @wikimediafoundation notability on wp is sloppy and seems arbitrary. i get the point of it overall, but it does give the impression of futility. you know, like laws that are strict, enforced unevenly, and used to target people who are already disenfranchised. you see people using deletion requests as punishment, as retribution. wp IS a bit toxic.

always this is framed as an imperfect system and better than nothing. yet when people decide to choose nothing, they wonder why.

@forestine @braid @wikimediafoundation

its broken. its unlikely to be fixed. good luck!

@forestine @braid @wikimediafoundation This is why we archive primary sources, cherish belief that a coming kinder world will access them.

@braid @wikimediafoundation EXACTLY THAT!

As we can see from #WikipediaFR there is no redeeming quality to invest time and labour into contributing to #Wikipedia when transmisogynists and Incels are literally backrolling any changes and deleting any appeals to their sabotage...

@braid

You, and the rest of the thread, may want to look at this federated wikipedia alternative that was announced just a few days ago:

https://ibis.wiki/article/Announcing_Ibis,_the_federated_Wikipedia_Alternative