Being hyper-abled and disabled are not mutually exclusive. That's why there are terms for people who exist at both ends of the ability/disability spectrum *at the same time*. "Twice exceptional", "idiot savant", "splinter skills", "spiky skill profile"... These are a few of the terms invented specifically to describe such a pattern. Autistic people, in particular, are likely to fit this pattern.

#ActuallyAutistic
#TwiceExceptional
#TwiceGifted
#Savantism
#IdiotSavant
#SplinterSkills
#Ableism

I was just told by someone that using "idiot savant" as an insult isn't ableist because they're insulting privileged, hyper-abled folks, not disabled people. But what exactly does calling someone that term imply? That they have a narrow skillset and are socially inept or otherwise disabled in other areas? It's using a disability as an insult, pure and simple.

#Ableism
#IdiotSavant
#Privilege

Every time you use a disability as an insult, you are reinforcing the notion that disability is worse than whatever it is you are insulting. You are helping to establish or maintain that hierarchical notion that disabled people are inferior. Yes, even calling a privileged, hyper-abled person an idiot or an idiot savant contributes to this, and is therefore ableist.

#Ableism
#Privilege
#TwiceGifted
#IdiotSavant

I know that telling people that "idiot" and "stupid", used as insults, are ableist makes them uncomfortable. That's why the posts I make about it go unboosted and unliked, in contrast to my other posts about ableism. It's so socially acceptable and commonplace, that no one bats an eye. But your discomfort at hearing what I have to say, doesn't make it any less true. The fact that it's so commonplace and ordinary to call someone an idiot or stupid or an idiot savant as an insult is all the more reason that this message needs to be heard.

#Ableism
#Idiot
#Stupid
#IdiotSavant

@hosford42
I think everyone including NTs have spiky sets.
They struggle with seeing other POVs, they struggle using feedback loops internal & external to examine their behavior & self reflect on consequences of actions, they struggle to see what is, let alone what is ahead, they struggle with many of the things autistics excel at. They have infrastructure to support their delusions of hierarchy, superiority & authority yet remain ignorant ignoring many things & people they discount.
@hosford42 they struggle with change even more than autistics. Have even bigger often violent entitled meltdowns and display antisocial behavior constantly if any thing in their life is being asked to change, especially if it’s for the better of all and not just themselves. Doing whatever you want with a sliding morality that is really just opportunistic. They suck at listening. They enjoy swimming on the surface, but are afraid of going deeper.
@JoBlakely The difference between a trait being deemed a disability as opposed to "normal" often comes down to whether society has built-in supports for that trait.
@hosford42 @JoBlakely yup. I wish I wasn't disabled, and by that I don't mean I want to be different myself, I mean I wish society was built in such a way that I could thrive exactly the way I am. Dietary restrictions, inability to work full shifts, ADHD ping-ponging between projects, ambulatory wheelchair use, inability to ride a bike and all.
@raphaelmorgan @hosford42 @JoBlakely
The reaction of abled people to ambulatory wheelchair users - that whole thing where they insist "Aha! Caught you faking!" if they see you stand - is one of the strangest social things I've ever seen. Who TF is going to "fake" needing a wheelchair? And if someone does roll around in one for the hell of it, why would anyone care?
It's really really strange.

@hellomiakoda

People who don’t really want to care and feel anyone who makes them care burdens them, want healed or not healed. They want all or nothing. Yes or no. They have no room for nuance or sometimes. Do they have to care or not, that’s their process. Because they really don’t want to have to care. So, at the first chance to deny care, they will.
@raphaelmorgan @hosford42

@hellomiakoda @raphaelmorgan @hosford42 @JoBlakely Maybe it's the old "sibling rivalry" thing. There's a fear, especially in workplaces, that "somebody might be getting away with something".
@anne_twain @hellomiakoda @raphaelmorgan @JoBlakely That is definitely a factor. A lot of abled people are jealous of what they see as "special treatment" of disabled people, never mind the concepts of equity and systemic ableism.
@hosford42 @anne_twain @raphaelmorgan @JoBlakely
"Special treatment" that usually doesn't even bring their access to basic abled people's access.
@hosford42 @JoBlakely it's true. I'm unable to fly without the crutch of an airplane to overcome this disability.

@hosford42

Whenever I use the word "stupid", I'm talking about somebody who has the capacity to understand why doing a bad thing is bad and counterproductive, but chooses to do it ANYWAY even though they ought to know better.

I really have no idea what other word to use for that.

@violetmadder @hosford42 depends on their reason for doing it (do they want the poor outcome?). People have put together lots of lists of alternatives, but you can start with willfully ignorant. If that doesn't match your exact use case, research others.
@violetmadder @hosford42 What about "knave"? Or "fool"?
@BernieDoesIt @violetmadder @hosford42 knave is such an under-used word. :)
@BernieDoesIt @violetmadder @hosford42 To continue the thought — knave, though, really doesn't carry that context, at least to me. A knave can be a deceitful, dishonest person who chooses to act dishonorably or to live outside the law; or simply a servant (usually a young male) or someone of ignoble birth. (See also villein and rogue.) Neither of these contexts have bearing on the objective wisdom or foolishness of a person's actions. I am finding myself having great difficulty up with any adjective much different from "unwise" or "ill-advised" to negatively describe the wisdom of actions, that does not have a noun form typically applied to a person to indicate that they behave, whether intentionally or not, in ill-advised ways, and your argument seems to me to be that any such noun, and therefore any such adjective, is automatically ableist.

Now I see two problems with this. The first is that if all negative terms in any subject are excluded as ableist, it becomes impossible to express a negative opinion of something in that subject. And then you lose the ability to criticize — in this case, bad actions. And if you start using instead words like 'jerk' and 'asshole' to convey different meanings than are usually understood by them, as substitutes, then you've done two things. First, you've confused people as to what you mean. And second, by using those words as substitutes for a category of words that you've decided are ableist,
you have de facto moved them into that category, and now you can't use them either, because now they are ableist.

The second problem I have with it is that if you assert that using words such as 'stupid' and 'idiotic' to describe bad actions or people who choose them is ableist about some certain set of people, then it seems to me that is tantamount to saying that bad actions of that type
distinctively identify that set of people. And now by trying not to be ableist about them, you are being ableist about them.

Ultimately, the gripping hand is I think you may be trying to read too much into this. Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar, and sometimes a stupid action is just a stupid action.
All of us are stupid at times, because we all do stupid things, whether through malice, ignorance, thoughtlessness, or forgetfulness — or even because we're in a bad mood. "Stupid is as stupid does, Sir!"
@zakalwe @violetmadder @BernieDoesIt It's pretty straight forward to separate the wheat from the chaff, IMO. If you praise or criticize a *person* for an intrinsic *ability* or lack thereof, it is ableist. If you praise or criticize and action, idea, decision, etc. for its own intrinsic qualities, that's not ableist. If you praise or criticize a person, for something voluntary rather than intrinsic, that is not ableist. So saying an idea is a poor one, is fine. Calling someone who refuses to take others' wellbeing into account an asshole is fine. As long as you don't conflate these things, you haven't taken away any power in the language you're using, nor have you caused any confusion by changing the meaning.

@hosford42 @zakalwe @BernieDoesIt

And even assholes are important body parts that need to be treated with care. I feel bad for insulting assholes when I'm talking about bad people.

There ARE no words for the horrors being done in the world, honestly.

@violetmadder @hosford42 @BernieDoesIt

There ARE no words for the horrors being done in the world, honestly.No adequate ones, anyway.

@hosford42 @violetmadder @BernieDoesIt I think we're on the same general page as far as language use. And anyone who wants to criticize anybody for having mental/cognitive deficiencies that aren't their fault or under their control, can just fuck right off.
@violetmadder @hosford42 In such circumstances I try to distinguish between simple ignorance/stupidity, "does not understand", and malicious stupidity, "understands perfectly well and does it anyway."
@zakalwe @violetmadder I just call those people assholes.

@hosford42
It's pointless & cruel to insult someone as stupid if you think them intrinsically incapable of complex thought.

But stupid is also applied to a person's behaviour/beliefs in an attempt to effect change, either in them or in others who might be influenced to copy it. It cautions us to think further & thus implies that we could & should.

Which words exhort those who could exercise reason (but don't) that it's desirable to think further, without tacitly stigmatising those who can't?

@FrightenedRat @hosford42 depends on their reason for doing it (do they want the poor outcome?). People have published lots of lists of alternatives online, but you can start with willfully ignorant. If that doesn't work for your exact use case research some others.

Insults don't tend to stop someone doing something they shouldn't, except if they respect the opinion of the person insulting them, and then it just hurts them.

@Aerliss @hosford42
Wilful ignorance suggests bad faith, so ... lazy thinking?

But with "lazy thinking" the problem isn't the laziness - as if being chill were a problem - it's the failure to analyse & weigh consequences correctly, which may cause harm. So "negligent thinking" fits better.

I agree insults don't persuade their target - though maybe words like "stupid" are effective on 3rd parties who (lazily/negligently) form opinions via tribal norms/deference & don't care WHY smthg is wrong.

@Aerliss @hosford42

I'm not arguing for the continued use of "stupid" - just thinking through how to differentiate careful Vs sloppy thinking in a world where if you stop to explain the detail of why a line of thought is in error, people's eyes glaze over.

On the other hand, some ideas seem so nonsensical it's hard to know where to begin in unpacking them & then I too want to be lazy and say, e.g. chasing unlimited growth on a finite planet is stupid.

Is it ableist to call Capitalism stupid?

@FrightenedRat @Aerliss I don't have all the answers. I'm just happy to see people thinking it through.

@FrightenedRat @hosford42 again, if my suggestion doesn't cover your use case there are plenty of other suggestions from people who have put far more thought into it.

I try to avoid reducing arguments against something to single word insults except when I'm in the echo chamber of my close friends and we're all just in "ikr??" mode. Insults aren't arguments against things. They are not persuasive. They're only useful when surrounded by people who agree with you, or to hurt people.

@Aerliss @hosford42
Thx. I read up but didn't find a substitute word for "stupid", then got confused about slurs Vs critiques.

I do see the ableism in attributing an intellectual disability in order to belittle someone.

But calling an argument/system stupid isn't a slur but a specific complaint about a lack of logic, judgement, reason & consideration that needs fixing.

I'd like a shorthand to express that an argument/system which lacks sense etc is inadequate without devaluing those with ID.

@FrightenedRat @Aerliss If you're talking about ideas (arguments, systems) and not people, you can say it's absurd, broken, illogical, nonsense, or just plain wrong. "Nonsense", in particular, is appropriate for cases where, in your own words, an argument or system "lacks sense". There's no need to use "stupid", which is also used as a slur for human beings. I don't think that calling an idea stupid is intrinsically ableist, but it can still do harm simply because the label is so easily transferred from ideas to their human sources or proponents.

@FrightenedRat @hosford42 have a look at the synonyms for "stupid" at dictionary.com

Unfortunately many of them are also ableist, but there are some others.

A slur can still be harmful if used to describe something other than a human because the use does not happen in a vacuum. While words are still used to denigrate a group of people we avoid using them at all. If you call an ill-advised idea "stupid" someone who has been called "stupid" many times may feel a harmful comparison.

@FrightenedRat @hosford42
Words carry baggage. They are not just sounds & a single meaning, but a web of memories & feelings. A lot of people hate the word "moist", & can't even hear it used to describe a cake without thinking about slimy, nasty things, & shuddering. Words conjure feelings, even when used in different contexts.

Ask yourself why "stupid" (or any word) feels like a good word for what you're trying to describe. What baggage is it carrying? Could that baggage hurt someone?