Holy wow - the Mastodon community really came through. This is huge, and makes a massive difference for our reporting. Thank you everyone - and thank you for showing how active and engaged this network is!
Done!
I've donated to ProPublica over the years (not as much as I ought, though!) & I strongly encourage my friends on here to donate now [use Ben's link!].
ProPublica is a great pro-democracy, anti-corruption resource here in the US & it would go a long way for them to know Mastodon is an audience aligned w/their work.
In that vein, I'd be super grateful if you guys had a Mastodon share button on your articles instead of, or in addition to, buttons for Twitter & Facebook.
@steve_zeke @chargrille All my colleagues' work! I just help with the technology side.
Thank you very very much for donating!
Awesome! Thank you!
I saw ProPublica now has something like 115K followers on here, which is a lot for Mastodon! So I can only assume that means they have a quite large audience & a lot of support. Suspect we'd see more articles from any outlets who implement that share button!
Thank you all for your support for their invaluable work, which I have used & benefited from for more years now than I'd like to count.
Nothing like being told it's only my money that matters. Mastodon only matters to you if it means your "team" doesn't need to work hard to fund it.
Swallow your pride—sell some steak knives or whatever. The corruption of the Supreme Court is well and heavily covered by all your competitors. For free.
@_chris_real Hey! Our journalism is free to access. And I'm a decades-long part of the open social web movement - Mastodon is very important to me indeed. I didn't mean to offend with my framing.
We're on a funding drive because it's a non-profit (like other public media outlets). Nobody pays to read what we do.
And others may be covering it, but it was our investigation that broke the story.
You told me that your opinion of Mastodon depended on how much money they sent you. You can't squirm out of that judgement by claiming you're a non-profit—but you "really need" money.
Did you —really— "break a story" though? Or were you the first who published what was well-known, but many were struggling to make known?
Your whole "but still—Capitalism?!?" reeks of the monarchists who infest post-capitalist marketplaces. We also call them magats and fascists.
Stick to steak knives (at least it's honest), although I hear silver-infused bedsheets also do well.
Read Marcy Wheeler/emptywheel for examples of 'actual' no-one-pays journalism.
I am a musician. You've got nothing to school me with about working for free.
@_chris_real *I* didn’t do anything. But yeah, the journalists broke the story. By doggedly following it for a long time. That’s what ProPublica does: actual investigative journalism that takes a lot of resources to produce. There’s a pretty good article about what it took here. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2023/05/clarence-thomas-harlan-crow-propublica-biggest-supreme-court-story.html
My Mastodon comment was really a flippant way of saying that I’d like Mastodon to show up in our stats.
But I seem to have got your goat,so I’d like to suggest we go our separate ways. Bye.
Of course. Troll for more money. Our ways are not separate, but our means to our ends define us.
I will match your barely adequate investigating with Marcy Wheeler's any day. Your 'breaking' claims are pretty irrelevant. The truth was there—it matters not who was first, but who made it MATTER.
You come to us with hat in hand, but suggesting that getting my goat is a discourse ender. Maybe my goat was got when you decided to monetize your virtue. I suggest you re-evaluate your 'yeah-but-ish' mentality.
Yeah, just walk away. . .
Having a representative of an org with NO presence on Mastodon come here saying 'Hey, if you give us money, maybe we'll like you' is offensive to me.
But since you butted in as a third party, picking a fight by proxy, maybe you shouldn't also put words in the mouth of people you haven't consulted.
Start your OWN fights, "big fan of big fans". You seem to hide behind others.
So I won't explain my objections to you. Make a post with your own opinion, see if people will respond. I doubt if I will.
I searched emptywheel for any references to Pro Publica—nothing in the past 4 years, maybe longer.
And Pro Publica is not hurting for money.
From wikipedia:
"ProPublica was the brainchild of Herbert and Marion Sandler, the former chief executives of the Golden West Financial Corporation, who have committed $10 million a year to the project.
"The Sandlers hired Paul Steiger, former managing editor of The Wall Street Journal, to create and run the organization as editor in chief."
Anyone know how much Steiger makes?
Also:
"While the Sandler Foundation provided ProPublica with significant financial support, it also has received funding from the Knight Foundation, MacArthur Foundation, Pew Charitable Trusts, Ford Foundation, the Carnegie Corporation, and the Atlantic Philanthropies. ProPublica and the Knight Foundation have various connections.
"For example, Paul Steiger, executive chairman of ProPublica, is a trustee of the Knight Foundation. In like manner, Alberto Ibarguen, the president and CEO of the Knight Foundation is on the board of ProPublica. ProPublica, along with other major news outlets, received grant funding from Sam Bankman-Fried, the founder of cryptocurrency exchange FTX.
"ProPublica has attracted attention for the salaries it pays its employees. In 2008, Paul Steiger, the editor of ProPublica, received a salary of $570,000."
So I'll make a deal with you, Big Follower. You give Marcy $1000, and the next time, I'll go easier on ProPub (who really doesn't need the money—only its lower-tiered journalists do).
Will you take the challenge?
@anildash .
Maybe you should make up your mind and stick with the story.
Your shallow opinion of those who disagree with you shouldn't be so all-encompassing as to be meaningless.
But at least you can apply it to anyone, right?
Stroll on . . .
Imagine thinking Pro Publica needs money:
"While the Sandler Foundation provided ProPublica with significant financial support, it also has received funding from the Knight Foundation, MacArthur Foundation, Pew Charitable Trusts, Ford Foundation, the Carnegie Corporation, and the Atlantic Philanthropies. ProPublica and the Knight Foundation have various connections.
"For example, Paul Steiger, executive chairman of ProPublica, is a trustee of the Knight Foundation. In like manner, Alberto Ibarguen, the president and CEO of the Knight Foundation is on the board of ProPublica. ProPublica, along with other major news outlets, received grant funding from Sam Bankman-Fried, the founder of cryptocurrency exchange FTX.
[Sam Bankman Fried, y'all . . .]
"ProPublica has attracted attention for the salaries it pays its employees. In 2008, Paul Steiger, the editor of ProPublica, received a salary of $570,000."
Hi.
Just tried to donate but the site didn't let me select my state. It did take the zip and everything else.
Android, older os, on an LGv30.
Using Firefox.
@ben Done!
I've donated most years in the past, but made a slightly larger donation just now.
@Arlenecw @ProPublica Thank you!!
A side project of mine is to make it MUCH easier to create "share to Mastodon" buttons. Different instance domains make it a harder problem - but we need them! This is a good push for me to finish up.
@ben @ProPublica Pay no attention to the trolls! 🙄
We need to normalize people asking for money for journalism on Mastodon. Period. End of story. No additional preamble or context required. The End.
Thanks for all you do! 👏