Loukas (They/Them) 🏳️⚧️In the same way as "the cloud is just someone else's computer" - "AI decisions are just someone else's prejudices".
Tim Ward ⭐🇪🇺🔶 #FBPE@Loukas That's what labelling is about - AI decisions (eg about whether a credit card transaction looks dodgy) are based on the "prejudice" of actual factual determinations. You might regard the victim of a fraud reporting it as a fraud to be prejudiced against fraud, but that's about as far as you can go with "prejudice".
Woodrow Douglass@TimWardCam @Loukas Almost -- AI decisions are based on the "prejudice" of determinations the labelers made, whether they're factual or not.
@bigfishrunning @Loukas "Prejudice" is about "pre-judging" something that hasn't happened yet. Labelling is about recording something that has happened.
Kagan MacTane (he/him)@TimWardCam You're using the etymological fallacy[1] to (try to) claim that the word "prejudice" doesn't or can't mean things like "an adverse opinion or leaning formed without just grounds" or "an irrational attitude of hostility directed against an individual, a group, [or] a race". But it can[2], and it's *quite clear* that @Loukas and @bigfishrunning meant it that way.
1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etymological_fallacy
2: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/prejudice, sense 2