Can someone explain me, why is it bad to think about yourself? This book teaches you, how to first think about yourself, than others.

She(or Nathan) wrote, that if you do something with “I want this, so I do this” manner, that isn’t great. The formula should be “This should be done, because of some rational reasoning, so I’ll do this”. If you are not involving others right to think/live/freedom.

This book teaches you, how to first think about yourself, than others.

No, it doesn’t.

In a world of Ayn Rand everyone also works together. She wrote, that people should work with each other. They will benefit from this. One person is not capable of doing everything. However, you can choose who to work with. You would always want to work with someone who does everything right and in time.

All people are not equal, and that is a fact, but in rational world they can work hard to be noticed by another rational person. You don’t judge by the look of their skin, cloths or fortune. You judge by the way they think. There would be no slaves, those who worked hard would earn more.

The machines are built by workers, but who made the blueprint? They sold it or shared it to make life more comfortable for themselves, thus making the progress. You will end up with better and more goods. This is one of the reasons you must value yourself.

Money is virtue, because it’s one of the least thing people agreed on as equal value to something. I really don’t want to barter for the new phone, to be honest.

It’s a problem, that you are not getting paid enough, but that’s not problem of the money, that’s people who are paying less are a problem.

Communism isn’t equal too. You, in fact, would get paid the same amount as everyone else. What’s the point of doing better and more, if you get paid the same?

So I still don’t understand to be honest, are there other explanations? With all my pleasure, if everything is shared, I do not want to share my woman with someone, who needs it more. Share my workplace with someone who needs it more, but I will give it to someone, who’s better than me. Share my payment, because someone needs it more. If I want to, I have some surplus and I won’t need it, than sure, I will share. I won’t do it mandatory.

So I still don’t understand to be honest,

No, you understand perfectly well - you are a simp for parasite ideology. Just like Ayn Rand was.

That’s not an explanation… I am only asking to explain in other way, I could understand. I can admit, that I am wrong, if objective reasoning is heavy enough for me to say “yeah man, whis Ayn Rand is such a parasite”, but I don’t see it, or don’t understand

You don’t understand how capitalism works?

Well, you are getting paid for your work, by someone who managed to get the business going, all hard things aside.

That’s not Capitalism.

Can you please explain me than? Seems I was wrong all this time…

Capitalism isn’t wage labor, it’s a specific mode of production by which individual Capitalists buy and sell Capital, then pay Workers wage labor to use said Capital to create commodities.

If the entity is Worker Owned, it’s Socialist, as Capitalism requires Capitalists.

In other words, worker is getting paid for creating goods/services for entity owner(capitalist in our case)?