So, just to be certain, when USA today keeps giving Trump the benefit of the doubt and uses words in this article like, riot, and alleged role, they’re carrying water for him right? The man has been found to have had a role andtaken part in an insurrection in multiple cases now. They should just say it.

When was he convicted of insurrection or anything related to that?

Here you go happy reading: www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/…/23SA300.pdf

You will find section G. Titled “President Trump engaged in an insurrection” to be of interest.

So a judge did an unjust thing and you want me to accept that as something that as okay?

Are you guys aware of what his happening right now with trump and all these cases and how its targeted prosecution? I am not even going to vote for him, but its pretty obvious what is happening, and I fear how this will end.

Oh, okay then

Exactly, you guys want to removed about the orange man, but dont actually want to look at the dangerous things we have going on with the government right now.

You should recognize that your message to people here is simply, hey people obviously dumber than me, did you know you’re all dumber than me? You’re assuming people that disagree with you know less or don’t know something that you do.

That’s not how you engage in constructive discourse. You should first seek to understand, than to be understood.