So, just to be certain, when USA today keeps giving Trump the benefit of the doubt and uses words in this article like, riot, and alleged role, they’re carrying water for him right? The man has been found to have had a role andtaken part in an insurrection in multiple cases now. They should just say it.

When was he convicted of insurrection or anything related to that?

You blind, deaf, and dumb?

Just dumb. Did I miss the part he was convicted of insurrection?

You missed the part where he was found by a court to have engaged in insurrection.

So there was a trial and everything?