#Live #testimony

Superior Court Judge Scott #McAfee determined #NathanWade’s fmr #law partner & divorce lawyer must tell the court what he knows about special prosecutor #NathanWade’s relationship w/ DA #FaniWillis – a decision that could produce more bombshell testimony as defense attorneys seek to disqualify the DA from prosecuting the #FultonCounty #Georgia #Trump #ElectionInterference #RICO case.

https://www.ajc.com/news/watch-live-terrence-bradley-testifies-on-fani-willis-nathan-wade-relationship/FDLUQWVCL5A4RFBZKJDO7Y35FM/

GDPR Support

Judge #McAfee is once again doing a lot of work educating defense #attorney Merchant on #trial #witness examination procedures.

#Trump #legal #law #lawyer #criminal #conspiracy #Racketeering #RICO #obstruction #fraud #FaniWillis #Georgia #ElectionInterference

#TerrenceBradley is not a great #witness, he does not recall much of anything & as revealed at the end of the last time he was on the witness stand, his #credibility is far from stellar given he left the #law firm w/ #NathanWade after being accused by both a client & an employee of #SexualAssault.

#Trump #FaniWillis #legal #law #lawyer #criminal #conspiracy #Racketeering #RICO #obstruction #fraud #Georgia #ElectionInterference

Painful #witness examination of #TerrenceBradley by the #attorney for Michael Roman, #AshleighMerchant.

Both Bradley & Judge #McAfee are doing most of the work for her.

FYI #Trump's attorney will appear over Zoom.

#FaniWillis #NathanWade #legal #law #criminal #conspiracy #RICO #obstruction #Georgia #ElectionInterference

Sadow, #Trump’s attorney, is a much better lawyer than Merchant. He’s not getting objections & his examination of #TerrenceBradley is making Bradley appear to be less than truthful under oath.

#FaniWillis #NathanWade #legal #law #criminal #conspiracy #RICO #obstruction #Georgia #ElectionInterference

@Nonilex I do not quite understand. This is supposed to be their star witness of the defense. They must have figured out that he lied before. Why do they want it to be out in front of the judge? Shouldn't they just have withdrawn the whole thing? What are they trying to prove here?
@andrej to establish that he is perjuring himself under oath, that he may have changed his account of the timeline due to influence & that perhaps his initial account was the more truthful one.
Either way it isn’t good. Anything at anytime from this witness is unreliable.