Meta is downranking/hiding political content on Threads. The company says Threads will “not recommend any content/accounts that post about politics.”

Here’s the issue: what counts as “politics” is often any news abt people who have had their whole existence politicized, such as news about Black people, LGBTQ people, disabled ppl, women, etc. Climate scientists, public health experts etc also considered “political” https://www.axios.com/2024/02/09/meta-political-content-moderation-threads

First look: Meta won't recommend political content on Threads

Meta is laying out the details of its policy.

Axios
@taylorlorenz honest question: why is that an "issue"?
@berkes "political" in this context isn't being defined by people with long term outlooks but marketers wanting to assure advertisers. At best it's code for "anything that might create a backlash that translates into monetary losses"

@zbyte64 I get that.

Let me rephrase.

Why is it an issue that one instance on the fediverse silences (or even outright censors) certain topics, people, views or ideas?

@berkes @zbyte64

Meta does not govern it's supposed instances like Mastodon does.

Meta has for a decade at least, censored ProDemocracy speech before fascist and christofascist speech.

This censorship extends to IG and all of their "instances." -- though I've seen no evidence that there are any more instances than the central one where I am now.

@beccanalia @zbyte64 not sure if I understand you correct, but you seem to see two problems: that Meta does this on all their estate. And that the fediverse isn't really federated?

The first part *is* a problem, if and when FB, IG (and WA) silence marginalized ppl. But to me, the solution is Federation: allow these ppl to move to a safe space where they have a voice and where everyone who wants, can hear these people. Even from within the meta estates. Which threads is?

@berkes @zbyte64

That's my point. The federated part of Threads seems to be just hype. We don't sign on to separate instances. After signing up, we're placed into a central area.

Supposedly there is a way to create a "thread" (instance), but they don't seem to encourage it.

It's happening across all the different instances, it seems.

@beccanalia @zbyte64 I can follow people from threads here. And from my personal "a thread" (selhosted instance).

I'm not on threads, but saw some first follows the other way. When they (carefully) roll that out, it's just another instance.

For the sake of the argument: is it an issue when one instance silences certain types of content, groups or ideas?

@berkes @beccanalia @zbyte64 I believe it could be an issue. Imagine that you have an email provider that scans and filters your email, even though emails are of a standard protocol, the email provider still filters what the users sees and thus is capable of shaping the perception of its users.
@antmaker @beccanalia @zbyte64 the solution seems simple to me: just move to another mail provider?
@berkes @antmaker @beccanalia there's a reason you can take your phone number when you switch providers: because updating all your contacts isn't simple. Neither is changing the login email for many accounts.