@Red_Shirt_Dude I *loved* The Expanse for exactly this reason.
I mean it wasn't perfect, but I can think of only three things that were clearly wrong. Two are core concepts that we turn a blind eye to because they are foundational to the entire story universe. The third, though, is simply a special effects goof.

1) The Epstein Drive: Basically an impossibly efficient rocket engine. It doesn't break physics, but it is highly implausible engineering.

2) The Protomolecule: This stuff ignores the laws of physics in many ways, including faster-than-light communication, reactionless acceleration, and creating SciFi wormholes that can practically transport physical objects between star systems.

These two are fine since they're fundamental to the plot and to the general world building. The Expanse doesn't exist without them, everybody watching agrees not to complain about it. Hard science fiction almost always works like this.

3) A scene early in series one, where they're working on the exterior of a ship under acceleration. A character drops a crowbar. What would happen in real life is that the crowbar simply falls, exactly as if a worker on the outside of a skyscraper dropped something: gravity is indistinguishable from acceleration. However, the animators hired to create this special effect did not know this, and instead made the crowbar fly shoot off weirdly to the side. The writers and producers caught the error too late in the production process to do anything about it, and have apologised many times in interviews and their own podcasts.

And that's pretty much it. I used to follow Corey S James on the birdsite and they spent a LOT of time answering armchair physicists who thought they'd picked up a mistake or misunderstanding of physics. They were always wrong.