The term "Luddite" has become synonymous with "technophobe" but that's not what the Luddites were about. They were a labour movement that fought to give workers control over the technology that was advancing without oversight and rapidly automating them out of their jobs. Sound familiar?

"Luddite" as a pejorative was a technocrat PR coup.

@Wolven Well, yes, the mill workers who destroyed machinery that stomped on their livelihoods. They were stomped on in the end. But then, England would have been stomped on if they had failed to industrialize.

And there you have the tragic human condition. Propaganda aside, technological progress generally harms lives of masses of humans, but nations that try to resist get dominated.

Depressing. But the least we can do is have a little compassion for those who "progress" has harmed.

@Fionas_Father @Wolven England could have industrialised without stomping on workers. It is simply the authoritarian mindset to not care or listen to the issues faced by those deemed lesser. Authoritarians seek only 'yes men'. Had the issues of workers been taken seriously things could have progressed far more smoothly and quickly. And that is still the case today. And not just with workers, but all groups facing oppression that people refuse to listen to.

@toni @Wolven I am always in favor equality and opposed to authoritarianism.

But that does not change the central tragedy of what happened then and now. Technology altered the playing field as to the most efficient way to accomplish a particular thing, and those that resisted (on the company level or the national level) were going to get out competed.

Been going on since pre-historic times.

I hate it, but hating it doesn't change it.

@Fionas_Father @toni that's some real laissez faire silliness right there. No thanks

@Wolven @toni Not really sure what you're saying here. Agreeing? Disagreeing? Disagreeing with what?

Hopefully you are not suggesting we fight laissez faire capitalism by pretending it didn't and doesn't happen?