Finally sitting down to compose some thoughts on what we can and probably should do about the swatting problem in the US. I'm finding I have quite a bit to say, and a lot of it involves mythbusting around this issue (e.g. that most of these swatting calls come through 911).

Another example: recent legislation to make swatting specifically a federal offense w/ real jail time for those convicted (introduced by a GOP lawmaker who was swatted). That might feel like a solution, but I doubt it's much of a deterrence for the sim-swatters.

Make it explicitly a federal offense with federal consequences, okay sure. But the feds have prosecuted these cases just fine using existing laws. The problem is, until the feds are aware of swatting incident, it remains effectively a local issue, which means the cops are less likely to investigate because these crimes are generally inter-state crimes They are usually by definition federal crimes for that reason, but they are still mostly dealt with by local authorities and local laws. One way a federal anti-swatting law could help is to require state and local law enforcement to report these crimes as violent crimes to some entity responsible for tracking them as such. Right now, there is no specific designation for swatting, and reporting is only required for federal law enforcement agencies. Reporting also serves an important accountability check on law enforcement responding to these incidents.

I should add that in a lot of swatting cases, it is true that the resulting police response is often dramatic enough that it gets captured by local news (that is, after all, a big part of the point of swatting). But a lot of them happen and never get this attention.
@briankrebs When it's become commonplace, it's no longer newsworthy, or so I'm told.
@briankrebs Why isn't at least one of the potential solutions demaximising police response in general?
@mwenge @briankrebs yeah the whole reason this happens if cause it works. Police will stage a military invasion based on an anonymous tip and are trigger happy enough to kill people even if they aren't armed (and often provide little opportunity for anyone to disarm and deescalate when weapons are in play on both sides, instead preferring to use the presence of weapons to justify someone's murder).
@briankrebs I assume the reason this doesn't get prosecuted effectively is that the police don't want to actually draw much attention to their incompetence and how easily they're duped.
@briankrebs Without over sharing ( it's not my story to tell), one of these incidents happened to a friend who was working on a fairly famous and popular video game. It didn't come with a signed note, so the cause is just assumed. It's actually a pretty goddamn traumatic experience. I am not going to give details, but I think people don't realize how bad it is emotionally, and fearing for your life from the police, nominally supposed to protect ( leaving aside that problem).
@Oggie @briankrebs its awful, and only gets worse the less training we give and the more weapons. Every part of the chain of events is broken.
@briankrebs I feel like locally for the cops to be clowned like that and being used against innocent civilians they’d rather not have it publicized and prosecuted so they don’t look bad. It’s certainly an incentive to sweep it under the rug.
@briankrebs I don't know the detail, but how many of these calls are genuine vs fake? I guess without mandatory reporting you can't really know.
It feels like, as someone outside the US, that the problem is the full force response, but perhaps that's a bias from Europe and it is the warranted response?
@sldrant @briankrebs
It is accurate to say that swatting is only effective because many LEOs react with disproportionate force to any perceived threat.
@ulidig @briankrebs seems like a rather expensive response too. Surely they should be looking at the cost of a whole swat team for a teenager call-out, especially if a real fallout is quite rare - which comes back to the question of whether anybody is counting it at all
@sldrant @briankrebs
My sweet summer child. Police budgets are infinite. Even cities that talk about defunding the police just keep right on increasing their law enforcement budgets.
@sldrant @briankrebs When your go-to “protection” tools are monetary fines or physical violence, the response is almost always disproportionate and harmful.
@briankrebs Is there currently a mechanism for collecting statistics on what the SWAT teams are used for? If not, setting one up might be a good idea.
@briankrebs Looking forward to hearing your thoughts on this
@briankrebs yeah. It beats a lot of similarity to credit card fraud.
@briankrebs In discussions I find people confuse swatting with actual use of SWAT teams when most response is by local PDs available LEA.
One point that's been repeatedly made to me and I find credible ... is SWAT teams are being used for non-swat purposes like non-violent warrant serving.
I get this. You don't want a bunch of cowboys sitting around collecting pay without earning it and actual need for swat tactics (like active school shootings) is too rare to justify spending.
@fincoot Correct. A lot of people say "what is [insert country in Europe]" doing that the US isn't? Leaving aside the need to de-militarize our police forces a tad and the prevalence of guns in this country, there are > 18,000 police jurisdictions in the US, each with an ability to conduct these raids. And usually, you're right: It's local cops, and not proper SWAT teams. But many of these police forces have riot gear that is roughly equivalent.
@briankrebs love the idea of tracking it as a violent crime and hopefully imposing some accountability on law enforcement handling of those incidents.

@briankrebs You know there are also issues with ICE detaining people who are in America legally? It’s not rare by any means and there are things they could do to ensure it doesn’t happen nearly as often but they don’t do it.

Kind of similar to how police departments could do a lot to cut down on SWATting but they don’t.

@briankrebs How about "Demilitarize local police forces so they don't have the weapons and authority to launch unannounced raids in overwhelming force against residential targets"? Is that an option?

Related question (an honest one): how often are the levels of force represented by SWAT teams actually needed? Do SWAT teams in large cities respond to valid threats justifying the response weekly? Monthly? Once in a blue moon? I don't know the answer to that, but I can't help but think it's relevant to the discussion...

@briankrebs scaling down the existence of SWAT teams -- abused wildly at present in circumstances way different than those SWAT was originally intended to address -- would be helpful as well. Towns below 100K residents arguably do not need SWAT at all, and definitely do not need the paramilitary hardware that typically comes with having it.