“GET OUT OF MY WAY! GO BACK TO CHINA WHERE YOU CAME FROM!” Nancy Pelosi LOSES it after pro-Palestinian protesters took over her driveway, triggering her into a shouting match
“GET OUT OF MY WAY! GO BACK TO CHINA WHERE YOU CAME FROM!” Nancy Pelosi LOSES it after pro-Palestinian protesters took over her driveway, triggering her into a shouting match
Im guessing its a take on the horseshoe theory centrists like to spam that both left and right are the same, but flipping it around to say centrists and right are the same.
First time seeing it, but its a clever rebuttal to a simplistic take.
tl;dr: no u
So, centrists are very fond of a thing called ‘horseshoe theory’ which posits that as the left gets further left it ends up meeting the far right.
Fish hook theory is a riposte.
Image description: a fish hook with the ‘far right’ tip of the hook bending around to meet the ‘centre’ of the shaft, with the end of the shaft being the ‘far left’.
They’re super unreliable crypto right wingers that wish they were like a barstool sports or lad bible, but this story is more or less accurate
It’s a shitty propaganda site
She’s blaming Russians, not China
nbcnews.com/…/nancy-pelosi-seeks-fbi-probe-protes…
It still doesn’t make sense tho
She’s calling protestors calling for a cease fire Russian paid operatives, but then also calling for a cease fire now that this story is blowing up?
I don’t think she understands what’s going on, just another elderly “moderate” who acts more like trump everyday.
No idea why they don’t just retire and attempt to enjoy their remaining years, no one is asking for them to stick around till they die in office.
It’s clearly an altered headline made to get attention
Which part is inaccurate?
From fucking Xitter moderation in the article even:
"Video has been edited. Pelosi actually says, “Go back to China where your headquarters is”
Way to fall for the disinformation.
Now the real question is “is that organization actually headquartered in China?” Because that would be quite the coincidence…
I said something similar when she claimed it was Russia pushing protests, but maybe she could be right. Both China and Russia are known to use agents provocateur, and have an interest in sowong discord in the US.
That’s not a defense for supporting a genocide. Leaders in the west are making it easy for foreign agents to lather up protesters because they provide plenty of material for their pamphlets. If there were no valid complaints, then the efforts would become far more transparent and far less effective.
Leaders in the west are making it easy for foreign agents to lather up protesters because they provide plenty of material for their pamphlets. If there were no valid complaints, then the efforts would become far more transparent and far less effective.
Exactly, and we should know how to handle this, when this same thing happened back in the day with KGB agents stirring up shit about Jim Crow, lawmakers said “y’know what, you’re right” and passed the Civil Rights Acts
This ~account exclusively posts articles from this one website~ whoops, that was someone else. Well, this website is rife with shady writing and topics.
Mild disinformation and biased reporting is probably the point.
In the context portion of the community note, there’s a link to a NYT article about the shady funding of one of the board members of Code Pink and a big donor to anti-war protestors like them.
He claims to not work with/for the Chinese government but from the article:
But Mr. Singham, 69, himself sits in Shanghai, where one outlet in his network is co-producing a YouTube show financed in part by the city’s propaganda department. Two others are working with a Chinese university to “spread China’s voice to the world.” And last month, Mr. Singham joined a Communist Party workshop about promoting the party internationally.