Back in my day - lemy

BlueSky Post. [https://bsky.app/profile/kevinhearne.bsky.social/post/3kjnofkjvyf2j] ::: spoiler Transcript. If you tell someone to “Google it” at this point you’re telling them to look up five ads and some AI-generated bs instead of the actual thing they want to know. old guy takes long hit on the bong “Back in my day, search engines used to find things besides the wreckage of late-stage capitalism.” :::

Google was a “disrupter”

Which means they burnt investor money for years to deliver a great product while not making any profit.

Once they gain market share and are the default, enshitification begins and people eventually wonder why they’re still using it.

Except that I wouldn’t use Google Search as an example of enshittification.

It isn’t like Google tried to break search to increase profits. Instead, the industry around Google changed to adapt to Google’s search algorithms.

Not really true.

Googles stance on protecting net neutrality totally changed over the years with the cell phone internet browsing, and them getting in bed with Verizon. Google=Verizon

Obama fought off the end of net neutrality his entire presidency.

Now they have a large financial reasonability to direct you to specific content and companies

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/net-neutrality-is-ending-heres-how-your-internet-use-could-change

'Net neutrality' is ending. Here's how your internet use could change

Changes are likely to happen slowly, as companies assess how much consumers will tolerate. Here's what you should know.

PBS News
I’m not defending Google itself, just noting that the declining quality of its search is based less on a malicious decision on Google’s part and more a result of SEO.
I mean, the 5+ ads that Google serves at the top before real results are not the result of SEO. It’s a problem sure, but don’t take the credit away from Google. They worked hard to make sure you see those ads.