German law is making security research a risky business.

Current news: A court found a developer guilty of “hacking.” His crime: he was tasked with looking into a software that produced way too many log messages. And he discovered that this software was making a MySQL connection to the vendor’s database server.

When he checked that MySQL connection, he realized that the database contained data belonging to not merely his client but all of the vendor’s customers. So he immediately informed the vendor – and while they fixed this vulnerability they also pressed charges.

There was apparently considerable discussion as to whether hardcoding database credentials in the application (visible as plain text, not even decompiling required) is sufficient protection to justify hacking charges. But the court ruling says: yes, there was a password, so there is a protection mechanism which was circumvented, and that’s hacking.

I very much hope that there will be a next instance ruling overturning this decision again. But it’s exactly as people feared: no matter how flawed the supposed “protection,” its mere existence turns security research into criminal hacking under the German law. This has a chilling effect on legitimate research, allowing companies to get away with inadequate security and in the end endangering users.

Source: https://www.heise.de/news/Warum-ein-Sicherheitsforscher-im-Fall-Modern-Solution-verurteilt-wurde-9601392.html

Gericht sieht Nutzung von Klartext-Passwörtern als Hacken an

Der Programmierer, der eine gravierende Lücke in der Software der Firma Modern Solution aufgedeckt hat, fällt unter den Hackerparagrafen, meint das Gericht.

heise online
@WPalant Honestly, completely unsurprised it's germany, the country that ripped out all its clean energy and replaced it with coal...
@SiteRelEnby Hey, I totally agree that Germany did really badly in this area, but are you certain about that “ripped out” and “replaced” part? From all I know, Germany merely stopped paying for building up clean energy capacities which essentially killed this industry branch. But whatever was there already stayed there (healthy increases again under the new government). And Germany isn’t actually expanding the capacity of its coal-fired power stations, though it could certainly retire them sooner.
Germany Rejected Nuclear Power—and Deadly Emissions Spiked

After Fukushima, the country opted to decommission its nuclear reactors. The US has a lot to learn from what happened next.

WIRED
@SiteRelEnby Oh, you referred to nuclear power as “clean.” Oook. 😂
@WPalant @SiteRelEnby

nuclear is the cleanest power source we have currently

@pharmafemboy @WPalant @SiteRelEnby wouldn’t say cleanest because of recent advances in solar and battery storage making things more efficient in that direction, nuclear uses lots of concrete so it takes a long time to offset the carbon emissions of that

Though generally speaking yeah, nuclear is considered clean energy, the coal powerplants getting built and fired back up to replace it in Germany produce far more radioactive waste that is released into the air than any nuclear plant would release in its lifetime