Hard agree.
I teach this as a basic principle in climate communication: Doomism is the new Denialism.
Why? Because denialism told you that action is pointless because there isn't a problem while doomism tells you that action is pointless because all is lost anyway. The "action is pointless" is the common denominator - and very often the point.
@weaselx86 @MichelleRNCHPN @GottaLaff
Thank you.
This research article about cartoons and the climate debate might be of interest to you. It's open access.
https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9788395720499-008/html
@SuneAuken @MichelleRNCHPN @GottaLaff
Republicans and Russians go heavy on a messaging strategy to amplify "futility feelings".
@Npars01 @MichelleRNCHPN @GottaLaff
A #MastoFriend of mine, I believe it was @pcsoblahdeehell, said to me that he always considers people shouting "all is lost" to be false flag accounts or deluded to the point of being as bad as them.
(or something along those lines; I'm quoting from memory)
@pcsoblahdeehell @Npars01 @MichelleRNCHPN @GottaLaff
Well, I remembered something sensible and attributed it to you somehow. Must mean that I take you to be sensible.
Beyond that, I'm sorry for the misattribution.
@peterpohlenz @GottaLaff
And unlike Senator Manchin and Senator Sinema, they're still pretty reliable Democrats.
(But aggravating though Manchin is for pandering to coal, and his 50th vote games, he delivers committee assignment votes and a lot of lower profile Democratic votes, in a very conservative state, so good for him. Sinema, on the other hand, plays 50th vote games in a swing state.)