I love the headlines that are like “now that mickey is public domain, you can generate him in AI!” as if AI has been somehow respecting copyright this whole time

@cabel We all know the AI companies are just watching the public domain lists, eager to honour artists rights, right?

… right?

@cabel Yeah, if they can't prevent worse things, I don't expect them to outdo Disney lawyers
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-65932372
Illegal trade in AI child sex abuse images exposed

Paedophiles are using the technology to create and sell life-like abuse material, the BBC finds.

@cabel I also like how all the sophomoric edgelord stuff is described as “counterculture.” Because there’s nothing more counterculture than carefully observing the distinction between fair use and public domain.
@SasquatcherGeneral And apparently we’ve all forgotten Wally Wood already drew that one poster back in 1967
@cabel @SasquatcherGeneral by transitive property this is public domain now right
@cabel (and as if the AI models can distinguish between Steamboat Willie Mickey and all the later versions that still enjoy copyright protection)
@cabel there’s also a lot of people who don’t seem to realize that only the Steamboat Willie version of Mickey is public domain, not the modern version of him.
@cferdinandi @cabel And even then it's just the short itself, you cannot make things that use Mickey's likeness or his name still. It's a weird fundamental misunderstanding of what something transferring into the public domain actually means.
@cabel you can generate him in ai even harder now
@cabel
The more people & news outlets speaks about copyright & public domain, the more I'm reminded that most of them knows goddamn nothing about it.