I'll address the comments about Liz Cheney by telling you what Harvard Professors Ziblatt and Levitsky say about how democracies die and how they are saved.

(The book is fabulous and was quite timely when it came out in 2018)

Basically, they said this (page 299):

When one of the candidates (in this case, Trump) goes off the deep end and embraces autocratic methods, what will save the nation is Republicans to switch and vote Democratic . . .

1/

This requires short-term sacrifice.

The idea is not that the Republicans give up conservatism and become Democrats.

The idea is that they switch over and accept short-term political sacrifice for the good of the nation.

The authors give an example of this happening: In 2017, defeated French conservative candidate Fillon called on his partisans to vote for center-left candidate Macron to keep nutcase Le Pen out of power.

2/

Early in her own book, Cheney mentions that her voting record is more conservative than the "freedom caucus" but she wanted nothing to do with them because she could see they were unhinged.

She isn't giving up being a conservative.

She isn't going to become a liberal.

She is doing what Ziblatt and Levitsky said Republicans would need to do to save us from someone who has gone full-on authoritarian.

Their book was widely read. No doubt Liz Cheney read it.

3/

Go ahead. Be angry at the Cheneys for their politics.

But recognize what Liz Cheney is doing and why she is doing it.

She is willing to endorse her ideological rival -- and anger her own base and colleagues--to keep Trump out of power because she recognizes that he is uniquely dangerous.

In her book, she is calling out the Republicans who continue to kiss Trump's ring as moral cowards.

I don't like her politics, but I respect what she is doing and why.

4/

While Cheney is now "Never Trump," she has not really committed to voting for Biden in 2024 either. I admire her speaking out against her GOP colleagues who continue to support Trump, & she MAY be willing to endorse her ideological rival but she hasn't explicitly done so yet. I think it was in her interview with Rachel Maddow that when asked if she would vote for Biden, Cheney said "whatever it takes." To me that was a carefully constructed non-endorsement.

More concerning to me is that in an interview with Charlie Sykes a few days later (link below), she opened the door to vote for a 3rd party candidate rather than Biden. If Liz were to throw her support to a 3rd party candidate, I can't see that helping anyone other than Trump. I'm baffled as to why she introduced this idea. I can understand her "non-endorsement" of Biden because Trump could croak & she might vote for Christie or Haley, but the 3rd party thing is weird.

https://www.thebulwark.com/podcast-episode/liz-cheney-a-clear-and-present-danger-2/

Liz Cheney: A Clear and Present Danger - The Bulwark Podcast - The Bulwark

Donald Trump will never be the lesser of two evils. We must unite, look beyond partisanship, and vote in ways that will maintain the republic. Liz Cheney joins Charlie Sykes on today’s podcast. show notes: https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/liz-cheney/oath-and-honor/9780316572064/?lens=little-brown 

The Bulwark