Let's ease into it with some whimsy: a #DeathMetal cover of #JohnCage's 4'33" from Dead Territory. Warning, once you hear them perform this banger, it'll be stuck in your head all day, especially in those quiet moments of reflection:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kGEG4JiOqew

Those guys go *hard*. You know who else goes hard? *Billionaires*. Especially when they're bribing judges.

2/

The #ClarenceThomas/#SamuelAlito bribery scandal prompted the Supremes to proffer an entirely ornamental and toothless code of conduct:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/11/17/red-team-black-robes/#security-theater

It takes a *lot* of work to create an accountability mechanism than the system that other federal judges answer to. The #JudicialConference oversees the rest of the federal bench, and it's far too flimsy to qualify as a paper tiger - maybe a toilet-paper kitten?

https://www.propublica.org/article/judicial-conference-scotus-federal-judges-ethics-rules

3/

Here's how weak the ethics code for non-SCOTUS federal judges is: 100 members of the US federal judiciary enjoyed 251 luxury junkets paid for by two billionaire-controlled dark money orgs:

https://www.levernews.com/billionaires-are-bankrolling-judges-luxury-travel/

The #AntoninScaliaLawSchool ("the finest in legal education") funneled money from its wealthy backers to judges on 152 occasions, paying for transport, meals and/or lodging. The #FederalistSociety did the same on at least 99 occasions.

4/

Gifts from these two orgs constitute 42% of all judicial disclosures from the entire judiciary. While some of these trips took judges to GMU's campus, the majority of these junkets were sited at tropical beauty-spots at fancy resorts.

No other organization does anything remotely similar and not every judge gets to enjoy Fedsoc and GMU hospitality - just the ones who produce rulings favorable to the organizations' backers.

5/

Oligarchy takes many forms, but it is a single project: the transfer of wealth and power from the many to the few. This isn't an easy sell. The manifest problems of organizing our society to benefit a few wealthy people at the expense of the rest of us mean that the system's legitimacy is constantly crumbling and must be continuously shored up.

Take the US "health" system, unique on the world stage for how much it costs and how little it delivers.

6/

As with other American pathologies (like, say, internet access), US health care is more expensive and less effective than rivals (however, it is more *lucrative* than those systems).

And yet...the US health insurance system keeps finding new depths of sleaze to plumb. From #PatrickMRucker, #DorisBurke and #DavidArmstrong for #CapitolForum and @ProPublica: a deeply reported story of the worst doctors in America and their indispensable role for insurers:

https://www.propublica.org/article/malpractice-settlements-doctors-working-for-insurance-companies

7/

Doctors are overwhelmingly highly trained, ethical professionals who want to help their patients. But they are often thwarted by insurers, who deny their recommended treatments as unnecessary. When patients complain that corporate bean-counters are overriding their medical professionals' advice, the insurers insist that nothing of the sort is taking place.

8/

Your claims aren't being denied by an algorithm or an accountant - rather, they're being individually reviewed by another qualified MD, who's helping you avoid #AllopathicRisk by offering a second opinion and keeping you safe from unnecessary interventions.

It's true that insurance companies pay trained doctors to assess (and deny) claims - but *which* doctors do they employ?

Absolute fucking *butchers*.

9/

*Propublica* found that insurance companies are the preferred second act for MDs who have lost their medical licenses and their malpractice insurance after repeatedly, egregiously maiming and killing their patients. These doctors bumbled their way out of the ability to see patients, and now they get paid big bucks to *review 10,000 cases per year* and override the judgments of their competent, still-practicing peers.

10/

Only in America! These docs killed with scalpels and prescription pads, and now they get to continue to hurt the sick and injured with a DENIED rubber-stamp.

Oligarchy makes everything worse - even Twitter, a thing that was objectively *very bad* before it was acquired by a fool who found greater fools to bankroll his folly. An excellent package in *The @verge* lays out a timeline of bad-to-worse, leavened with some of the better moments:

https://www.theverge.com/c/23972308/twitter-x-death-tweets-history-elon-musk

11/

Musk didn't inaugurate Twitter's #enshittification, but he sure speedran it. The sudden platform collapse syndrome he brought to the hellsite prompted a mass exodus, with millions of ex-Twitterers landing on Mastodon. Of course, not all of them stayed on Mastodon, which is a totally normal pattern for platform growth:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/02/11/of-course-mastodon-lost-users/

Far more interesting are the people who *wanted* to leave Twitter, but didn't.

12/

Bootlicker economists will tell you that your continued presence on a platform you loathe is a "#RevealedPreference," As David Roth says, the job of a neoclassical economist is to come up with new ways to say, "Actually, your boss is right."

13/

Meanwhile, *tech bros* will tell you that the reason you keep using their products despite professing a deep loathing for them is that they are dopamine-hacking evil sorcerers, a claim that doubles as a salespitch to credulous advertisers who love the idea that they can rent time on a mind-control ray and use it to trick you into buying their garbage.

14/

But there's a simpler explanation for platform stickiness, one that neither gaslights you by insisting that you like things you hate, nor does it validate the self-serving claims of delusional high-tech Rasputins. The reason you use platforms you hate is because you love the people there. The reason *they're* using the platform is that *you're* there. You have a #CollectiveAction problem: you all want to go, but you can't agree on when to depart or where to go.

15/

You're like the residents of Anatevka in #FiddlerOnTheRoof, who, despite getting six kinds of shit kicked out of them by Cossacks on the reg, all stay put in their village because they can't bear to part with one another:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/07/23/when-the-town-square-shatters/

16/

A scholarly analysis of which communities left Twitter supports this thesis. "Drivers of social influence in the Twitter migration to Mastodon," published in @Nature, finds that the looser a community was - the less important its members were to one another - the easier it was for them to up sticks and move from Twitter to Mastodon:

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-48200-7

17/

In other words, if the people you hung out with on Twitter weren't that important to you, then switching to Mastodon wasn't a big deal. You would find equally satisfying people to hang out with there. Ironically, this made it easy for the community to remain intact, because its members could trickle from one platform to the other without undue suffering during the transitional phase.

18/

Your ability to change your technology habits is ultimately governed by #SwitchingCosts - the things you have to give up when you go switch vendors. When a company can hold something you value hostage - the people you love, the data you rely on, or even access to your front door locks - then can treat you worse and you'll still stick around. The "revealed preference" here is that you like your family photos more than you hate Mark Zuckerberg:

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2021/08/facebooks-secret-war-switching-costs

19/

If we're going to make a new, good internet that *stays* good, we have to keep switching costs low. One way to do that is to decentralize our services through #federation, like Mastodon does. But federation is just table-stakes. For full decentralization, you want #PeerToPeer, in which our devices talk directly to one another. #P2P was once the new hotness, but copyright lawsuits chased P2P design underground for a generation.

20/

Now, it's reemerging. New P2P systems are popping up and popping off. My @eff colleague @ross breaks down the promise of two of these - @spritelyproject and @VeilidNetwork - the latter having taken last summer's #Defcon by storm:

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/12/meet-spritely-and-veilid

Moving the locus of control to your own device is critical to staving off abusive conduct. If you want to make sure a company *won't* hurt you, then make sure it *can't* hurt you.

21/

High-tech guns on the mantelpiece in Act I will blow your face off in Act III. Last week, I wrote about Polish security researchers who discovered that NEWAG, who make locomotives, had boobytrapped them with remote killswitches that shut them down if they were independently serviced:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/12/08/playstationed/#tyler-james-hill

22/

It's a wild story, and it keeps getting wilder. This week, @404mediaco's @jasonkoebler got deeper into the story, surfacing juicy technical details and connecting the scam to his years of excellent reporting on #RightToRepair:

https://www.404media.co/polish-hackers-repaired-trains-the-manufacturer-artificially-bricked-now-the-train-company-is-threatening-them/

The dirty tricks used to brick locomotives to punish disloyal customers are widespread in heavy equipment, but they started in personal devices.

23/

Apple, in particular, has been an endless innovator of fuckery, finding all kinds of nasty ways to control how you use your device after you buy it:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/09/22/vin-locking/#thought-differently

Inevitably, Apple insists that it's engaging in these dirty tricks to protect it customers. That's the rhetoric the three trillion dollar tech giant rolled out last week when they smeared #BeeperMini:

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/12/without-interoperability-apple-customers-will-never-be-secure

24/

Beeper Mini is an Andoid #iMessage app, which independently re-implements Apple's iMessage end-to-end encryption so that Apple customers' data isn't left unprotected and unencrypted when they communicate with Android users. Apple's message to its customers is that if they want security, they should confine themselves to communicating with other Apple customers. If that's not good enough, Apple says, you should buy your Android-using friends iPhones:

https://www.theverge.com/2022/9/7/23342243/tim-cook-apple-rcs-imessage-android-iphone-compatibility

25/

This is of a piece with Apple's antirepair rhetoric. Apple claims that they're taking away your right to get your phone repaired by the depot of your choosing in order to protect you from unethical repairers who steal your data. That really *is* a risk:

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/article-computer-repair-shops-customers-personal-data/

But it's a risk that can be mitigated. Google just announced a new #RepairMode for Android devices - this lets technicians boot and test your phone without accessing your data:

https://gizmodo.com/google-pixel-8-phone-self-repair-1851102537

26/

It's nice to see Google guarding its customers' backs every now and again, even from its depraved enshittified depths. Google also just announced that it will move GMaps' location data storage to your device. That means that it will no longer be able to use Maps data to answer #GeofenceWarrants (AKA #ReverseWarrants), where the cops demand the identities of everyone in a location - say, all the participants in a #BlackLivesMatter demonstration:

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/12/end-geofence-warrants

27/

As with Repair Mode, this is a best of all worlds solution. Maps users can still get access to their location history, but Google can't. Google's also end-to-end encrypting Maps data backups, so you can store your Maps data in the cloud and recover it if you lose your device, but Google can't see that data and use it to answer law enforcement demands.

It's a marker of how far Google has moved on #LocationalPrivacy.

28/

Just a couple years ago, top Google execs who oversaw Google Maps were caught complaining that *they* couldn't figure out how to opt out of Google location tracking:

https://pluralistic.net/2021/06/01/you-are-here/#goog

That's why - as my @eff colleague #JenLynch writes, we have to look very closely at these new privacy promises:

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/12/end-geofence-warrants

29/

"Google collects additional location information as well. It remains to be seen whether law enforcement will find a way to access these other stores of location data on a mass basis in future":

https://apnews.com/article/828aefab64d4411bac257a07c1af0ecb

Sorting corporate technical claims from reality requires independent verification and discussion - AKA hackers. The reverse-engineers who relentlessly poke at the workings of tech are how we get to find out whether it's safe to rely on the systems in our life.

30/

One of the oldest and best hacker cons in @2600's #HackersOnPlanetEarth (#HOPE), now heading into its fifteenth biannual edition:

https://www.2600.com/content/hope-xv-officially-announced-special-ticket-deal-week

I've attended many of these cons, and they're amazing. I'm also a huge fan of *2600* magazine - I'm a contributor *and* lifetime subscriber.

31/

The archives of *2600* were critical when I was researching and writing *Picks and Shovels*, the third #MartinHench novel, which comes out in Feb 2025. I relied on *2600*'s DRM-free ebook archives:

https://www.2600.com/Magazine/digital-back-issues

Keeping ebooks DRM-free means that they don't contribute to high switching costs that lock you into platforms that harm you. If you can quit a platform and keep your ebooks, then the second a platform sours, you can bolt for the exits.

32/

This cuts both ways: DRM keeps readers locked into platforms, but it also keeps *publishers* locked in. As @cstross prophesied over a decade ago, #Kindle DRM locks in the publishers' best customers, meaning that the publishers would not be able to credibly threaten to sell elsewhere because their readers wouldn't be able to leave Amazon without surrendering their books:

http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2012/04/more-on-drm-and-ebooks.html

33/

In the intervening years, Amazon has found a myriad of ways to shift value from publishers to themselves. Pro-monopoly economists say this doesn't matter, so long as Amazon remains good to readers, but unfortunately for those economists, reality has an anti-neoliberal bias:

https://www.fastcompany.com/90996547/e-books-are-fast-becoming-tools-of-corporate-surveillance

34/

Ebooks are now surveillance honeypots, allowing Amazon to capture an *astonishing* amount of private data on readers - data that is especially dangerous in an era of rampant book banning:

https://www.fightforthefuture.org/news/2023-12-07-25-human-rights-organizations-call-on-2024-congress-to-investigate-big-tech-and-publishings-stranglehold-over-digital-books

35/

The irony here is that all of this surveillance data isn't even accessible to publishers, who know less about their readers every day - even as Amazon, a monopolist that dominates bookselling, *and* competes directly with publishers - becomes the world's leading authority on publishers' best customers.

Blunders like DRM make it easy to dismiss publishing as a "legacy industry."

36/