#Threads is testing federation for a few selected profiles. I'm now following @mosseri! It's one-way for now, but it's exciting. It's a step towards the interoperable social web that we've been advocating for ๐Ÿ™‚

If youโ€™ve got questions about what interoperability with #Threads means, we wrote this up back in July, and you can still refer to it:

https://blog.joinmastodon.org/2023/07/what-to-know-about-threads/

What to know about Threads

Thereโ€™s been a lot of speculation around what Threads will be and what it means for Mastodon. Weโ€™ve put together some of the most common questions and our responses based on what was launched today.

Mastodon Blog
Make no mistake, this is huge for Mastodon. Currently people have to choose between X, Mastodon, and Threads, and network effects play a dominant role in that choice. If we can say, you can access all the folks that went to Threads from a Mastodon account, that makes it a far more attractive option given all of its other perks ๐Ÿ˜‰
@Gargron Also puts pressure on Bluesky (which has some traction in some German bubbles) to federate fast, too.

@dailybug Bluesky uses a completely different protocol and won't be ever compatible with ActivityPub that Masto and fedi co are using.

@Gargron

@brawaru Thanks for making me aware of this! I was under the impression that the AT Protocol behind Bluesky was supposed to connect to ActivityPub eventually, but reading up on it, you are right: that's not their plan.

@Gargron

@dailybug @Gargron Bluesky is going to support federation, but using AT Protocol instead of ActivityPub.