With the success of #DeepNeuralNetworks in building #AI systems, one might wonder if #Bayesian models are no longer significant. New paper by Thomas Griffiths and colleagues argues the opposite: these approaches complement each other, creating new opportunities to use #Bayes to understand intelligent machines 🤖
📔 "Bayes in the age of intelligent machines", Griffiths et al. (2023)
🌍 https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.10206
Bayes in the age of intelligent machines
The success of methods based on artificial neural networks in creating intelligent machines seems like it might pose a challenge to explanations of human cognition in terms of Bayesian inference. We argue that this is not the case, and that in fact these systems offer new opportunities for Bayesian modeling. Specifically, we argue that Bayesian models of cognition and artificial neural networks lie at different levels of analysis and are complementary modeling approaches, together offering a way to understand human cognition that spans these levels. We also argue that the same perspective can be applied to intelligent machines, where a Bayesian approach may be uniquely valuable in understanding the behavior of large, opaque artificial neural networks that are trained on proprietary data.