The super-rich are killing us. Not just figuratively, but literally.
________________________

Climate change is overwhelmingly a problem of wealthy people. The wealthiest 1% of humanity produce over 1,000 times the emissions of the poorest 1%. In fact, these 77 million people are responsible for more climate-changing emissions than the poorest 66% (5 billion people) of humanity.

Since 1990, the personal emissions of the world’s wealthiest have exploded. They are now 77 times larger than the level that would be compatible with a 1.5°C warming limit.

Who are these super-polluters? The richest 1% are billionaires, millionaires and people earning over US$140,000 (£110,000). The threshold to join the rarefied club of the top 10% is US$41,000 (£32,000), including most of the middle class in wealthier countries.

But the super-rich are responsible for climate change well beyond consumption-based emissions. The super-rich, by and large, run major companies, direct investments and shape national and international laws. They have an oversized and controlling impact on our media and public opinion, including through advertising and ownership of media outlets. And they directly shape policy through lobbying and paid-for influence.

While their money and power make them overwhelmingly responsible for climate change, they are also insulated from the worst impacts. They are less affected by increased food prices and climate disasters, can afford insurance and to move from one place to another, and have greater resources to draw on in times of crisis.

It is the poorest – those least responsible for climate changing emissions – who suffer the most. They suffer higher losses, live in the most impacted regions, and have little to no access to savings, public support or welfare when crisis strikes. They are also least able to exercise their rights as they are the least powerful and less well represented politically.

It would take approximately 1,500 years for someone in the bottom 99% to produce as much carbon as a single billionaire does in a year.
________________________

The choice is very simple. Either we can have a livable biosphere or we can have billionaires. But we can't have both.

FULL ARTICLE -- https://theconversation.com/emissions-inequality-is-getting-worse-heres-how-to-end-the-reign-of-the-ultra-polluters-218308

#Environment #Climate #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis #ClimateEmergency #Capitalism

Emissions inequality is getting worse – here’s how to end the reign of the ultra-polluters

Society’s wealthiest are responsible for generating climate change – but who are these people, and why are their emissions so high?

The Conversation

@breadandcircuses yawn. Old complaint, no new solutions.

Name a gov which wants to cut off the hand that feeds it by taxing the beejeezus out of their donors? Nope. I can’t either.

Here’s a thought experiment. What if it was existentially risky to be a billionaire? Or a centi-millionaire? How quickly would we see a change of attitudes, habits and lifestyles? What if super yachts kept mysteriously sinking? Private jets crashing?

Now start the ethics debate.

@GreenerFutures
As long as we have democracy - okay: as long as we still have proportional votes, public opinion could make it politically fatal to not tax the super-rich until they're no longer super-rich.

For that if course, we need some sort of consensus on the matter. But I'm seeing opinions changing in a bunch of places.

I'd really prefer that over physical violence because nobody watches their climate emissions in a war.

@breadandcircuses