ProtonMail and SimpleLogin emails will be blocked from registering on websites
ProtonMail and SimpleLogin emails will be blocked from registering on websites
left-pad. JavaScript devs are wild.
Yep.
Iāve already run into a few. I mentally thank them for preventing me from wasting my time and money with them.
Is this going to be the response every time this shit happens until weāre all just sitting on Lemmy twiddling our thumbs?
In a lot of cases, you may not have a choice of using the site or not. In cases where you do have a choice, eventually most if not all the alternatives can do the same shit if it becomes normalized.
The problem is the trend. And try as you may, you can not fully escape that.
Simple as, if they donāt even support e-mail itās surely a rather shite site.
The closed garden corpo-approved electronic message service the github issue is talking about simply wonāt do.
GitHub blocked me from registering with a Proton domain:
Our abuse detecting systems flagged your account because of the email address you used to register the account. Before we can remove the flag we need you to add and verify a personal, non-disposable, non-aliased email address.
And since people wonāt use the website, the website wonāt use the list. So the list would be useless.
The maintainer seems to have followed the same interpretation, weighing legitimate use against spam use. This is the official response to the issue as of 8h ago:
Dear Contributors,
We value your suggestions for expanding our list of disposable email providers. Your input is crucial in enhancing our toolās capabilities.
Decision on Gmail and ProtonMail Inclusion
After thorough evaluation, we have resolved not to include Gmail and ProtonMail in our list. Our rationale is based on the following technical and operational considerations:
1. **Reputation and Reliability** * **Gmail and ProtonMail**: Established, reputable providers with a high trust level for personal and professional communication. * **Distinction**: Unlike typical disposable email services, they offer long-term, reliable email solutions. 2. **Active Abuse and Spam Prevention Mechanisms** * **Effective Systems**: Both providers have robust mechanisms to detect and mitigate abuse and spam. * **Proactive Monitoring**: Ensures a secure email environment, reducing the prevalence of malicious activities. 3. **Commercial Intent of Typical Disposable Email Providers** * **Focus**: Targeting providers driven by ad revenue, facilitating spam/abuse. * **Gmail and ProtonMail's Model**: User-centric, not primarily ad-driven. 4. **Domain Limitations** * **Effectiveness**: Limited domain offerings by Gmail and ProtonMail make them less susceptible to misuse. * **Strategy**: Focusing on providers with extensive, rotating domain lists for more impactful filtering. 5. **Individual User Accountability** * **Accountability Measures**: Both services have mechanisms to penalize users violating terms, decreasing misuse risks.Summary and Next Steps
Including Gmail and ProtonMail does not align with our criteria for identifying disposable email services. Our aim is to target services significantly contributing to online spam and abuse, without impacting legitimate email services. We have reviewed your list and agree on adding some providers, like internxt.com (Reference). We will also incorporate the obvious choices from the tail of your list. We apologize for the delay in addressing this issue but intend to promptly resolve it by focusing on the most impactful additions.
With 125 stars and 11 forks?
Pretty much nobody.
Edit: If anything, that issue feels like an attempt at viral marketing for fakefilter.
Honestly, the more these one time accounts try to convince me to remove protonmail and simplelogin, the more I see how much it's needed to block them. It's like the marketing team is desperately trying to keep their services from being rightfully flagged and it just makes me want to block them even more.
what did protonmail do to you ._.
It appears that the Github user GalacticHypernova is not a contributor to the 7c/fakefilter project - just someone asking for some domains to be added. The current list does not contain proton.me or protonmail.com.
I suppose this might be a reasonable litmus test for the reliability of that list.
simplelogin.io: The current domains according to what I can see are: slmails.com simplelogin.com aleeas.com slmail.me silomails.com 8shield.net 8alias.com dralias.com simplelogin.fr Their entire pr...
I thought that bit was hysterical.
"Tell me you've never been employed before without telling me."
"I prefer discord for business communication."
Itās actually really easy to get past the custom domain issue.
If the domain is send-and-receive, it will need a SPF record to avoid getting blackholed by most mail providers. A TXT lookup for the SPF record would tie the custom domain back to the real provider.
Or even easier, you could look up the MX records to see what domain they point to.
I donāt use Simplelogin so I donāt know how their service works. The domains used for aliases donāt need to originate email so thereās no need for an SPF record. The A record for the hostname used for the MX record(s) could technically point at multiple IPs that could be changed often.
I own a significant number of domains and manage my own servers. Thereās quite literally no way for anyone to prevent me from using an email alias.
My point was that trying to block email aliases is a foolās errand. Itās a slight hindrance to only the least technical users. The entire 7c/fakefilter project is an exercise in futility.
Hah, thereās also seznam.cz (meaning āa listā) - I wouldnāt be surprised if more then half of whole Czech Republic (so ~6M) uses that as their primary mail provider.
Itās also a main local web search and maps provider among other stuff, and pretty popular with non-english speaking part of the population.
If the maintainer accepts this they would be most probably killing the project, canāt imagine people using it when it drops their user registration by a lot because of blocklists this wide.