You could, I suppose, argue that the 20th century produced worse villains than Kissinger, or that his motives were less personally corrupt than those of many of his peers.

But here's the thing. As an American, I must remember that Kissinger's crimes were done at least partly in my name. That the blood he spilled stains my own hands.

We must repudiate his legacy, or we will always remain complicit in it.

@mattblaze he took actions that extended the Vietnam war to get Nixon elected.

Literal treason, that got US service people killed.

He did it all in his own name.

@bynkii Perhaps it's comforting to believe that he did it all for himself. But I don't see how that lets us off the hook so easily.

@mattblaze no, it lets no one off the hook. But “he did it for <larger cause than personal power and influence>” makes him sound like he had a good purpose, good ends. He never did. It was all about Henry Kissinger, he saw himself as the cowboy with guns blazing. Said that in an interview.

It was always about him.

@bynkii @mattblaze Yeah, so many of the things he did make no strategic sense, only if you assume he had a visceral desire to see whatever party was more evil in a given situation triumph and inflict suffering...
@bynkii @mattblaze The following around him is more like a cult than a conspiracy, of like-minded awful people who see manipulating political situations as a game of 4D chess with themselves as the would-be masterminds, delighting in the harm to folks who "take it seriously". Like a channer edgelord/gator/etc. ahead of his time.