Tom Gauld offers some new acronyms for your pleasure - enjoy
@ChrisMayLA6 Ongoing suboptimal performance 🙂
A
@ChrisMayLA6 Nuclear safety has a few fun and baffling event names: "Anticipated Transient Without Scram" (aka ATWS; reactor didn't automatically shutdown when it was supposed to, "Jane, how do you stop this crazy thing!") and "Loss of Hydraulic Holddown" (coolant flow through core lifted some of the fuel elements and we're not precisely sure where they are right now). Fuel assemblies weigh around 800 kg (or 1800 lb) but a lot of coolant gets pumped up through the core so you end up securing the fuel in place or knocking down the momentum of the coolant by changing its direction as it enters the bottom of the core. Fuel assemblies might have a nozzle on the bottom that fits into a similar nozzle on the lower fuel support plate (you'd need both nozzles to break to get unimpeded flow up through the fuel).
@ChrisMayLA6 The other one I can think of is "Core Disruptive Accident" but it's mainly theoretical and even the physicist who dreamt it up (Hans Bethe) later said it was likely nonsense. The idea was that a fast reactor core would melt and the lower 2/3 or so would slump into the lower head of the reactor vessel and go subcritical (i.e. shut down) until the remaining upper 1/3 of the core suddenly gave way, dropped on to the rest of the core debris causing the whole thing to go prompt-critical with a stupidly huge burst of energy until the thing blew itself apart. This isn't an issue with water-cooled power plants, only with fast reactors that don't use a moderator to slow neutrons down - those can't go critical without a lot of water or carbon mixed in with the fuel. The CDA is a nice science fiction scenario but it's so far beyond low probability as to be a fantasy.

@ChrisMayLA6 My employer gave us a new one.

Wildly
Important
Goal

Dig the Wig!

@ChrisMayLA6

"Rapid unscheduled disassembly" was when I knew M was just F ing with us.