Hey, the A.I said it not me.
Hey, the A.I said it not me.
People in the comment seems to not understand that it doesn’t mean average on the “scale of beauty/attractiveness”. But averaged features. Like if you merge all nose shapes of a million person you get this nose, ect.
It was tested already several years ago that people tend to like faces made by merging a lot of faces together and “averaging” them. Most of the time rating them more attractive than the individual faces used.
I don’t find the source anymore… I’ll check better later.
People in the comment seems to not understand that it doesn’t mean average on the “scale of beauty/attractiveness”. But averaged features. Like if you merge all nose shapes of a million person you get this nose, ect.
It more likely means ‘like faces that were called average in the dataset’ rather than an actual average.
Well, there is a J-Novel with title Didn’t I Say to Make My Abilities Average in the Next Life?! where the world average takes into account the state of the absolute maximum and the absolute minimum.
So an average strength human would be between an amoeba and a dragon.
What if the ai is lying? What if it’s lazy and like “fuck it, this’ll do to keep the meat bag happy.”
What if?!
If you use humans to fine tune and judge the quality of output, then in some sense, that’s pretty much all the AI can possibly do.
Everyone can see the output, “I don’t know.” and mark it zero (dude). But if the model instead generates some bull then the meat bags on the other side are absolutely going to reward that behavior with a sounds-good-to-me thumbs-up.
I mean the grey background and bland expression may be skewing our perception. I wanna see these people in a meadow with a mouth open smile wearing colorful pastel clothing!
On another note I’d love to see photoshop battles start up on Lemmy 😎