@noondlyt human rights is my only voting issue. Until all people are considered “people”, with equal rights, I don’t give a shit about the rest.
And that’s the reason I could never consider voting anyone but Biden.
If someone says they are thinking about voting for a third party, ask them to name every member of congress that party has. ... It's none. Then ask them to name every state-level elected official they have. The Libertarian Party has 1 and the Green Party as none.
There isn't a third option, because no third party even tries to win at the state level. It's always President or Bust.
@mrblissett @csstrowbridge @noondlyt
There are only two parties and that is the case for my lifetime and I am now an ancient Dem.
The frauds from hell took enough of the vote to result in Bush and Trump in office.
It should have been Gore and Hillary - etc. They are full of crap spoilers, grifters and liars.
@KFClinton @mrblissett @csstrowbridge @noondlyt Did you forget Perot, who gave Clinton the win in '92?
Just because the billionaires have cornered the political market doesn't mean that I have to vote for their candidates.
It's the duty of prisoners to try to escape. :)
@grumble209 @mrblissett @csstrowbridge @noondlyt
You do not know much about the parties and who pushes the candidates of the Greens for starters.
Moscow came up with "Grow a spine and vote for Stein" and many other ads/slogans. It was uncovered by the massive investigations after the debacle.
The GOP was also doing as Putin wished, we have the evidence for years.
I am a proud Dem. We are the sane party.
Not a prisoner, a lifelong volunteer to grow the sane party.
@KFClinton @mrblissett @csstrowbridge @noondlyt Yup - Greens in the US are a scam, and I'm embarrassed to say I was snookered.
Not sure that's a compelling reason to vote for a warmonger like Biden. I'd hold my nose and vote for him if the Dems would pass some campaign finance legislation, though.
Otherwise I'll stick with "None of the Above".
Weird - the track record that the Dems proudly tout (New Deal, Social Security, Welfare, Voting Rights, Civil Rights) were all lefty policies that they'd never support these days. And yet the Dems seem to expect modern lefties to support them. Nope. Politics is quid pro quo.
@grumble209 @mrblissett @csstrowbridge @noondlyt
In decades of voting I have never missed, not once. I also knew the Greens in the 70s and they were full of shit even then.
Biden is NOT a war monger.
Campaign finance legislation was taken away by the SCOTUS and is an arbitrary point on the grand scale of things.
Know what isn't arbitrary? Voting for the best candidate to beat the orange idiot which will literally save democracy.
Shrugs.
Done.
@grumble209 @KFClinton @mrblissett @noondlyt
"Not sure that's a compelling reason to vote for a warmonger like Biden."
Warmonger?
By the way, Biden was the first president to go to a union strike. He's more progressive than people give him credit.
@csstrowbridge @KFClinton @mrblissett @noondlyt Has there ever been a military deployment that Biden hasn't supported?
Except his own, of course.
@tob @csstrowbridge @KFClinton @mrblissett @noondlyt The only one that comes to my mind is the $100M Biden is willing to pay Kenya to 'stabilize' Haiti so we don't have to send Marines.
But please, name some other places where Biden is not willing to deploy troops.
https://apnews.com/article/haiti-violence-united-nations-4acd3429d1bd84020efac538ba6c8746
The Biden administration is pledging $100 million to support a proposed Kenyan-led multinational force to restore security to conflict-ravaged Haiti and urged other nations to make similar contributions. Secretary of State Antony Blinken announced Friday that the U.S. would provide logistics, including intelligence, airlift, communications and medical support to the mission. It would still need approval by the U.N. Security Council. Other than Kenya, which would head the operation, personnel from several Caribbean nations would also be deployed to the country. Blinken also urged the international community to pledge additional personnel as well as equipment, logistics, training and funding for the effort to be successful.
@noondlyt @KFClinton @mrblissett @csstrowbridge Some Dems are fighting hard. Some Dems are not fighting.
Our two parties, funded by a divided ruling class, prevent even wildly popular change (like campaign finance reform, plugging tax loopholes) from happening.
I see 2024 as between 3 decades of run-of-the-mill asshole billionaires and 4 decades of awful-bad asshole billionaires. Corporatism vs quasi-fascism, if you like. I hate both, and I'd rather see the wheels come off the system than keep it limping along and not just passively postponing reform, but actively working against reform.
Because once the wheels come off, we *might *have a chance to fix the obsolete things in the Constitution (like the Electoral College and FPTP). As long as we're limping along, nothing meaningful will change for the better. Or it could get even worse. But I trust Americans.
But, I'll hold my nose and vote Blue if the Dems reform something. Because politics is quid pro quo.
@grumble209 @noondlyt @KFClinton @mrblissett
"Because once the wheels come off..."
We don't get to vote again and LGBTQ+ people will be rounded up in concentration camps, along with anyone who isn't white and Christian.
Oh, also the climate will collapse faster.
@csstrowbridge @grumble209 @noondlyt @mrblissett
His argument is why everyone should vote for Biden and a Dem majority in both houses of congress.
By voting 3P and therefore voting for TFG, he is promoting the exact thing he claims to protest.
Either he is a lightweight thinker or he is is a disruption agent.
I had him muted, but will block since the last thing we need is those who make demands of Dems when the Dems do not even have control.
He does like to grumble. Apt name.
@grumble209 @noondlyt @KFClinton @mrblissett
If the wheels come off society, you won't have a choice.
Fucking move somewhere where they don't have a functioning government and see how well things work out for you.
@csstrowbridge @noondlyt @KFClinton @mrblissett Is that what you call the US government? Functioning?
Functioning for whom?
Empirically, the US government functions for the donors and the lobbyists.
Empirically, the rest of us have no effect on our government. (Gilens and Page, *Testing Theories of American Politics*, 2014)
This isn't democracy - this is representative plutocracy.
Maybe you haven't noticed, but a lot of what drives the GOP voters is frustration with the donor / lobbyist situation. "Drain the swamp," they say.
I'm asking for the Dems to implement policy that's wildly popular with the US population, and I get pushback from loyal Dems. What *demos *does the DNC represent, anyway?
@grumble209 @csstrowbridge @noondlyt @KFClinton @mrblissett
"Functioning for whom?"
Functioning for ME.
Obamacare completely saved my ass (our health insurance was stuck in a pre-existing-condition death spiral pre 2008)
My autistic son gets a stipend from Social Security and help from IDEA and other programs. We have functioning public schools that aren't run by religious fanatics. We have highways, transit systems, a working power grid, internet. And SO much else...
In other news Ukraine has continued to survive and NATO has held together in no small part due to Biden's skill at diplomacy. We are not at war with Iran (the way Bolton & friends wanted). I could go on....
@wrog @csstrowbridge @noondlyt @KFClinton @mrblissett Yup - the 1% have given the rest of us a reasonable lower-western standard of living.
As for the public schools, power grid, Internet, and public transit... well, most Americans don't travel to Europe or Asia anyway.
Biden is doing a great job prolonging every conflict at hand - Israel, Iraq (again, but only Iranians), Ukraine, and now Yemen. Buy your Raytheon stock now, bros; to the moon. As for NATO... best not to think too much about Turkey and Russia, right? And Turkey and the Kurds. And Turkey and Syria.
Domestically, have we had any signature Biden legislative wins? How about something hugely popular with all of America, like campaign finance reform?
As scary as the differences are between the Dems and the GOP, what worries me most is what they agree on.
@csstrowbridge @grumble209 @noondlyt @KFClinton @mrblissett
Also please learn some actual history. Revolutions pretty much *never* come out the way anyone wants because once the fighting starts, it's up to whoever has the most guns or the best military tactics or who gets the best supply line from foreign powers. The French ended up with Napoleon. The Spanish ended up with Franco. The Russians ended up with Lenin.
It could even be argued the American revolution went sideways -- who knows how things might have been gone if the property/slave-owners hadn't pulled off their coup in 1787?
@wrog @csstrowbridge @noondlyt @KFClinton @mrblissett Yeah - revolutions are a huge crap shoot.
I hope the current power structure reflects on that and voluntarily accepts a "New Deal" like compromise before shit gets nasty.
"Those who make peaceful change impossible make violent revolution inevitable" - some Democrat.
@grumble209 @mrblissett @csstrowbridge @noondlyt
No, I always knew that was not what happened. I was a volunteer on the Clinton campaign.
@KFClinton @mrblissett @csstrowbridge @noondlyt I stand corrected. Clinton took 3rd in several counties in Idaho, including where I lived at the time.
In fact, Clinton almost took 4th in Franklin County.
@KFClinton @grumble209 @mrblissett @csstrowbridge @noondlyt the bigger point is that perot didn't do any ground work. He didn't try to get anyone but himself elected. And so, even though he got a huge chunk of the vote, his movement ended right there.
If he had spent a modicum of effort on building up local candidates, America might well have gotten a viable 3rd party out of that election.
@tob @KFClinton @mrblissett @csstrowbridge @noondlyt I agree. But I don't believe that Ross Perot wanted to either develop a viable 3rd party that would outlive him, or wanted to define a political philosophy that would attract followers.
I think Matthew is right - although our Constitution doesn't talk about political parties, the voting laws we've got are tailored to divide up power between two antagonistic groups. And that kind of concentration of power is a sweet juicy incubator for corruption of candidates and donors.
I honestly don't know how the US can unfuck itself from the concentrated power of the Dems and the GOP. But I have hope that other people do have workable ideas.
What makes me sad is that in spite of widespread dissatisfaction with our money-based system, politicians pretend that it's OK, and people go along with the farce.
@grumble209 @KFClinton @mrblissett @csstrowbridge @noondlyt
".... Perot, who gave Clinton the win in '92?..."
This is a myth. Exit polling at the time showed that Perot took equally from both parties and Clinton would have won a two-way race.
If anything, Perot screwed things up so that Rs were able to use the "Clinton never won a majority" line, which made life more difficult later.
@wrog @KFClinton @mrblissett @csstrowbridge @noondlyt Cool - myth busted. I stand corrected.
But what do you mean by the "Clinton never won a majority" line? What problem is caused by failing to get over 50% of the popular vote?
@grumble209 @KFClinton @mrblissett @csstrowbridge @noondlyt
The problem with winning with <50% in 3-way race is the legitimacy of the winner can always be called into question; it will never be known for certain who would have won the 2-way (exit polling is not an election). Nor did it help that it was never entirely clear what Perot voters wanted or what the Reform Party actually stood for -- all indications are that Perot's own motivation was mainly a personal vendetta against GHWB and he didn't think the Democrats could win, so you could make pretty much any case you wanted for who he was actually drawing from (and in the end the Party fell apart when he stopped running, so it was mainly his personality that was holding it together)
@grumble209 @KFClinton @mrblissett @csstrowbridge @noondlyt
Now, to be fair, the Republicans probably would have come up with some other talking point had Clinton won a 2-way race
never mind that they immediately and completely forgot about this legitimacy "problem" the moment GWB got in on a SCOTUS decision in 2000 and then started governing as if he had this huge mandate.
@wrog @KFClinton @mrblissett @csstrowbridge @noondlyt Given that there's no Constitutional need to even have the same presidential candidates in all of the states, there's literally no reason to expect a > 50% popular majority for a president. I suppose it's nice, but not getting it is fairly meaningless in our system.
I'm not defending our system - it's old and fucked and almost every country in the world passed on it when they designed their systems. I think both parties keep it around because it's known and easy to game.
Rick Wilson and other Never-Trumpers have discussed the GOP paying third party candidates to run.
They paid the Green grifters etc. to run and take away a few percent nationally from the Dems.
It has been discussed in several former GOP strategist books and interviews.
They are spoilers, always were the party of dumbasses who are gullible, end of story,
Biden will be beaten by ANY other Republican then Trump. And he might lose to Trump.
Is there a Law that the Democrats MUST nominate Biden, who is Republican Light?
Two thirds or Americans want the government to do MORE to fight Climate Change. Biden is doing everything he can to accelerate it, just like Trump.
Did I say I wouldn't vote for Biden over Trump?
No, I did not. I said we should nominate someone Other than Biden BECAUSE BIDEN WILL LOSE.
Biden has been an awful President and the only people who call him Great are FANATICS, who don't even understand why his approval his slow low.
They blame the Media instead of reality. Never in American History have Americans been more in debt than today.
But go ahead provide me a LYING list of his accomplishments.
You people are something else. You worship a Republican...
"If you run a Republican against a Republican the real Republican will win every time"
Harry Truman