Our new project on near-room T proton conductivity in pyrochlore-based materials has started this Nov, so I would like to talk about some points, which are the core of the project: crystalline proton conductors and Hebb-Wagner-type measurements🧵.

#SciComm #WomenInSTEM #battery 🧪👩‍🔬

Before we have a look specifically at pyrochlore materials, we have to delve a bit into transport mechanisms: most oxides that show proton conductivity also have a considerable oxygen ion conductivity at elevated temperatures and very often, those two are somehow coupled. Normally, transport in oxygen ion conductors occurs via a hopping process from oxygen vacancy to oxygen vacancy, but obviously there are no special proton vacancies in our materials.
So there are two possibilities for the proton to move: either, it bonds on an oxygen ion and piggybacks through the structure (vehicle mechanism) or it bonds to an oxygen atom which then re-orients itself and the proton hops to the next oxygen atom in the structure (Grotthuss mechanism).

Let's now come to the pyrochlores: our benchmark material La2Ce2O7 shows a pyrochlore structure, which is a relative of the #fluorite and bixbyite structure. The mineral pyrochlore is relatively common with an ideal composition of Ca2Nb2O7.

📷: Brown pyrochlore crystal, Rob Lavinsky, iRocks.com

Big part of the research regarding La2Ce2O7 has so far been performed by researchers from Uni Oslo. With 0.24 mS×cm-1 at 550 °C, it shows a slightly lower proton conductivity than the best #perovskite, but higher chemical stability and a wide range of possible dopants.
This is, where our project begins: we would like to develop a doping strategy to reach a sufficiently high proton conductivity at T<250°C. The material can then be used for e.g. as electrolyte for small, sputterable on-chip batteries or fuel cells, or electro-chemo-mechanical actuators. 👩‍🔬🧪