@victorvicpal @agaguk @Gargron
I think you might be able to get across the fact that it's not good to support another company that has partial control over your company. As in, they have a monopoly that they're starting to subtly abuse.
@[email protected] @[email protected] My company won't let me have firefox. There is no reason, but I have no way to install it unless I can justify it in a way that is irrevocable.
@Gargron
I am a Vivaldi user for similar reasons.
The only reason I don't switch (back) to Firefox is the profile manager that Vivaldi has.
@Gargron My poor wording is to blame. I work on user tracking stuff as a job. Implementing / fixing consent management (cookie banners). Setting up server-side data collection. Diagnosing / fixing data collection faults.
Impossible to do in anything other than Chrome, because that's what users use and that's where all the debugging extensions work.
I could use Edge, because it's possible to install Chrome extensions in Edge, but Chrome is the standard, so that's what I have to use.
@Gargron @digitalstefan Many businesses use Chrome as the primary (if not only) browser for their intranet (mine does). They used Internet Explorer years ago, but now it is Chrome.
Use another browser & everything gets crazy! 😂
@darnell @Gargron @digitalstefan I remember when for some corporate Internets you could only use Internet Explorer 6 for several years when everyone else had upgraded.
Corporate computing can move at a glacial pace sometimes.
@onepict @darnell @Gargron @digitalstefan
I've had online medical appointments where the connection would only work through Chrome or Safari.
I'm sure it would have technically worked on Firefox, but the doctor's video chat system would just immediately reject it and tell me to install Chrome (which I didn't).
If I try to explain this as a problem to my doctor, they think I'm nuts.
(And I can understand that as doctors are not in IT, they think it's like someone complaining about the brand of telephone they use.)
There needs to be some IT-specific contact people can complain to if they're forced to use Chrome.
@onepict @darnell @Gargron @digitalstefan
It makes me wonder how much of this is due to Google trying to bounce developers into rejecting Firefox, or whether it's just lazy developers trying to save money on browser testing.
@FediThing @onepict @darnell @Gargron I don't think it's always a dev's fault. Clients are the ones likely to say "I only need this to work on Chrome and Safari" and the dev agency will write a statement of work agreeing to that in order to win the job.
The site probably will work in Firefox. Standards are pretty well adopted across browsers now. They just might not "support" it working in Firefox.
@digitalstefan @onepict @darnell @Gargron
Yeah... sounds like it could be what happened 😞
It ought to just have a warning saying "not tested on firefox" instead of blocking it completely. It wasn't like it was a safety-critical system either.
@Gargron @onepict @darnell @digitalstefan
Exactly! It's very odd/scary to see healthcare mandating Google.
@SubtleBlade @onepict @darnell @Gargron @digitalstefan
Maybe, but it's unlikely that 99.9999% of people would know that.