Innocent until proven guilty. It’s important to remember that.

However, I’d argue the President of the United States should be held to a higher standard than merely “not convicted.”

“Not convicted” is actually not a requirement. Being a natural born US citizen and at least 35 of age are the only ones, although specific convictions could bar him from holding specific offices.

If all of his lawsuits remain undecided until the elections there is nothing stopping him (and presumably finding a way to pardon himself ex post facto somehow).

He will appeal any and everything. He’s litigious and has enough funds to run this for a while.

He’s also a former president so he’ll count on special standing.

Convictions may - or should - move votes, but I fully expect him to be on ballots throughout the nation next year. A few states may use the 14th Amendment, but if any states prevail in that, I don’t 3xoect they were likely to go for him anyhow.

Someone will tell me I’m wrong, but states that want Trump enough do shady things. Also, anyone coming here with a sirens song about how Trump will be convicted and the DOJ really kkow this matters… Let’s see how this goes. I’m sure they’re serious. I’m also sure the justice system will give him every chance to prove himself not guilty.

He’s litigious and has enough funds to run this for a while.

That’s actually a big question especially if his businesses are seized.

People can help other people pay court costs. It’s done every day across the US.

Where are you getting your information?

His business assets are under audit and he’s not allowed to create any new accounts.

He can’t accept money, his legal team could buy they haven’t been paid by him or anyone else at this point.

His business accounts in New York, which is his main state of operation, sure.

He can accept money. He can use specific funds to pay lawyers.

I need to see a citation for what your are saying. I asked a question and all you did was say it less wrong, but still no reference.

It would be naive to assume there isn’t a federal investigation at this point.

Sure, but he’s partially in trouble for soliciting money and not using it for that purpose. Similarly his legal team repeatedly complain about not getting paid.

It’s fraud, his accounts are being investigated, this is public knowledge I need not prove to you because it is in fact common sense as well given the charges directly related to it.

Still no citation?

It’s not all fraud and it’s not all illegal. That’s effectively what you’re asserting not simply to me, but to everyone who reads.

That means a quick Google of things to find the common sense article that says he has no means of support. Not less… You’re not asserting less. You’re saying or strongly implying none.

I don’t need to, it’s common knowledge he’s being investigated for fraud both campaign and business.

It’s fraud, he’s being charged for it what even are you talking about.

Economists have been questioning his ability to pay since the order came down, again public knowledge.

nytimes.com/…/trump-donations-legal-bills.html#:~…

You’re still wrong.

Paywall

rationalwiki.org/wiki/Fallacy_fallacy

Saying “everyone knows this” and facts are presented and you double down?

That is not logical. Or reasonable.

You are doing the Trump, “everyone’s saying it…” and defending it while being factually wrong.

Sure, burden of proof lays with the accuser. An editorial, evidence it is not.

I’m glad the arbiter has spoken, have you any more decrees I should grovel for?

No I’m saying use Google, you won’t trust me anyway clearly so read it or don’t, it’s not going to bother me.

Trolling.

I have used Google both ways. It doesn’t say what you assert and the link works. I get that you’ve used up All your free clicks on every news source on the internet and now the internet is pay walled and you like that as a shutdown technique.

Just stop spreading falsehoods that matter.

Parse this extremely complicated set of circumstances if you will.

Trump has a legal fund.

His legal team including Rudy Giuliani keep saying they haven’t been paid yet.

Trump has a legal fund…

That sounds like something he got in trouble for with campaign funds iirc it was something with an f… Fued, no. feudal, nah. fan, don’t think so… Fra… Frau… Fraud… Fraud! It’s fraud!

Even at the peak of his fortune, he stiffed people if he could expect they wouldn’t sue,or sue successfully.

His Leadership PAC has money. Not as much as it did, but it’s got enough for a while. He’s been paying legal fees for certain other people too. This does not look like lack of funds. It’s just cold hard greed. And maybe spite.

Remember those are the losers who misadvised him (in his perspective).