Rachel Maddow Perfectly Explains How Trump Is Trying To Break The GOP
Rachel Maddow Perfectly Explains How Trump Is Trying To Break The GOP
I wonder how they’ll react.
[/sarcasm]
the video is a fb embed. allow me to save you the ads:
www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLDIVi-vBsOEyETRGoR… - that’s her channel, certainly you can find the vid there.

Here’s what I could pull off that dumpster fire of a website:
RACHEL MADDOW PERFECTLY EXPLAINS HOW TRUMP IS TRYING TO BREAK THE GOP
Rachel Maddow said that the Republican Party is the only institution that can pull the plug on Trump, which is why the former president is testing them by invoking Hitler.
Maddow said: There’s no bar association to yank his law license. There’s no radio or TV network to say we’re not hosting your show anymore. What is the institution here that decides this is on their patch? What is the institution here that decides that you can never espouse things like this and also be part of them and also represent them?
There is only one. It’s his political party. Which when he is running to be the Republican nominee for president of the United States, means he’s contending to lead that party. While promising he will build camps it hold millions of people in this country and use the military against American civilians at home in America and his political opponents are vermin who will be crushed and exterminated. That is the test here. That — he’s not running as an independent. He’s not running as the trump for president candidate.
He’s running as the Republican, he wants to be the Republican nominee for president. So that is the only institution, the institution that is be tested here. This is him testing the political party that he says he’s going to lead. Testing them now. One year out from the election, to see what they will tolerate as an institution. Which means every single member of that party will now have to answer whether this is who they are, whether this is hot they stand for, whether this is the cause of their party.
We know from history that a country under threat does not stand up for itself with some kind of civic objection that just redounds to the country at large. In real life, a country under threat stands up for itself when the institutions that make up the civic and political life of the country stand up and say what they’re for and what they can no longer stand for.
Video
Rachel Maddow was correct. At this point, Trump is intentionally invoking Hitler and Mussolini because he is testing the Republican Party to see if it will go all in with him on his fascism. Trump is trying to find out if he can transform one of the two major political parties in the United States into a fascist movement. In the fall of 2024, Democrats could stop Trump and his fascists from taking over the country, but there is a very specific reason for why Trump is using this rhetoric now.
Donald Trump has taken over the Republican Party. The next step is to turn the former party of Lincoln and Reagan into an anti-democracy authoritarian movement,
Thanks for the recap.
I’ve been hoping for a GOP/MAGoo war since 2015. Seeing Santorum talk about limiting democracy after the GOP debacle in Ohio it’s obvious that Donnie isn’t the only one ready to go full fascist.
The next step is to turn the former party of Lincoln and Reagan into an anti-democracy authoritarian movement
It’s abhorrent that the author/editor thinks Lincoln and Reagan are at all comparable.
Been saying for years that the man is too dumb, senile and self-centered to have some master plan. He’s just rolling with what works.
This has greatly shifted my thinking.
Because conservative minds see him as a “brick through the window”, a man who will return things to their rightful place.
Here’s the best explanation of Trump I’ve ever read. And I truly think it’s an important essay. And yes, it was on Cracked.com. Humor me and give it a 5-minute read.
Yes that’s very well written, and has many very good points. I can even understand the attraction of “the old values”, except the racism homophobia and religious fanaticism.
If the more important old values are considered to be integrity honesty decency and tolerance, you get a completely different picture.
Google David Letterman’s sex scandals. But it’s okay, because they’re on our side,
No it’s OK because he never claimed to live by Christian standards, and there is nothing intrinsically immoral about it, and he is not an elected official I voted on because of his values.
Trump on the other hand, is followed by people who claim Christian values, and Trump is by some even claimed to be the second coming of Christ.
But in reality he is a narcissist the exact opposite of being humble as the Bible teaches. He has been married twice and commits adultery, he lies constantly, and probably commits at least one deadly sin per day according to the bible.
The problem is the disconnect between the values these country folk claim to want to protect, and their actions that are actually directly contrary to that.
I think this needs to be shared around:
This graphic is from this MeidasTouch Network video.