Danish farmer about #Ukraine's membership of the #EU :

"I had not imagined that there would be war in Europe again. But if EU membership for Ukraine can ensure that it doesn't happen again, I would be more than happy to pay 25 per cent of my agricultural subsidies from the EU to them," says Leif Hougaard.
- "This would mean a lower income and less to fall back on. But that's how it is and should be. Because no one is dying here."

https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/udland/eu/det-kan-blive-dyrt-landmanden-leif-hougaard-hvis-ukraine-kommer-med-i-eu-men-han

Det kan blive dyrt for landmanden Leif Hougaard, hvis Ukraine kommer med i EU. Men han er klar til at punge ud

EU's nuværende landbrugspolitik står over for store forandringer, hvis Ukraine bliver en del af unionen.

DR

@Ruth_Mottram

In any case, IMO EU subsidies shouldn't be granted to those exploiting the environment and fueling the #climatecrisis , no matter the industry and member state.

A long way to go but nonetheless a must before 2029.

@proscience well I agree with that too.. Danish farming also bears a heavy responsibility for environmental degradation in Denmark (and via soy imports to feed the incredible number of pigs we export), so there in general needs to be a rethink around CAP, but we also need to work out how to feed the population and everyone likes cheap food.

@Ruth_Mottram

"Everybody likes cheap food" is certainly true.

But given how prevalent obesity and its consequences are for various health systems in EU MSs (Nordic countries incl DK usually faring much better than DE etc), it's too cheap. It should cover the /actual/ costs of co-causing the climate crisis, co-causing drought, co-destroying the environment (biodiversity etc).

If that were the case, people would eat less, be healthier, wouldn't see health costs rising.

A triple win situation.

@Ruth_Mottram Since I started working for a Danish company, I've really come to love this nation. They all possess something I've always wanted to be at the core of my personality—an objective view, regardless of whether it’s good or bad for me or my wallet.
@anonimowy yes there is very much an acceptance + promotion of the common good here. I think it's quite healthy for a society to think like that, though I note that not everyone is unselfish..
@Ruth_Mottram And I love it. Ever since I was young, I've wanted to approach life with that same objectivity because I deeply believe it's the best way to sidestep needless arguments and other troubles. But in Poland, where I'm from, it's quite rare to find. So, it was a wonderful surprise to discover this mindset was common when I started working at the Danish company and visited Copenhagen for the first time.
@Ruth_Mottram @anonimowy thing is: if everyone has something valuable to lose, comparable to what the neighbors have, peace and quiet is much easier to obtain for everyone. It is in my own interest that we’re all doing good. Also we’re humans and have empathy- it’s tuff to truly enjoy sitting in comfort if you know that there’s people standing hungry in the rain and the difference between you and them is mainly pure luck of place of birth. If only “everyone has something valuable to lose” was sufficient to ensure peace and quiet, sadly it is a prerequisite but not enough.

@Ruth_Mottram
Thank you for sharing.

We need more stories from those who see the bigger picture, not just "me me me"

@Ruth_Mottram well... Yes and no...
Even though this article was eight years old.
It still very much applies to this day
https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2015/10/02/farmers-suicides-the-rising-human-cost-of-the-eu-s-agriculture-crisis
Farmers' suicides: the rising human cost of the EU's agriculture crisis

French farmers are committing suicide on an almost daily basis, largely due to financial pressures arising from a crisis in agriculture. The problem #UnreportedEurope

euronews
@Ruth_Mottram the farmer who understands politics better than Brussels itself

@Ruth_Mottram

While this is a very noble thing to say by one Danish farmer, it would be naive to think that all EU farmers would share this attitude, especially as we faced similar conflicts of interests in 2000’s when many new Central and Eastern European joined EU and CAP, competing with Western European farmers.

Of course, this is going to create frictions, especially in the same CEE countries that don’t yet feel that confident as their businesses had been competing on the common market for the last ~20 years, half of which involved huge investments to comply with EU rules.

And of course, it’s going to be in long term good for everyone in the EU, but it requires a very careful and balanced policy management in order to deescalate such conflicts among all participants.

@kravietz @Ruth_Mottram yes. Especially since countries like Denmark and many states in Germany have agricultural business models (industrial pig farming...) that would profit from Ukraine in the EU and lower prices for fattening feed.

@t_mkdf

EU farming is complex, which creates plenty of traps to fall for, as demonstrated by this years Poland grain embargo. E.g. if German push for cheap feed from Ukraine using their lobbying weight this will once again antagonise Polish farmers who will rightly feel screwed by what they perceive as dumping practice. That’s why I highlight it has to be done very carefully.

@Ruth_Mottram

@kravietz @Ruth_Mottram yeah.

Food security is IMO one of main reasons for the established long term funding of Ukraine by Germany.

This is also one thing to keep in mind. German political establishment is less concerned about T-72s on the Elbe. But quite a lot about food security from the 2040s onwards...

@t_mkdf

As you remember, “energy security” was one of the main reasons quoted by Germany for construction of NS2, mostly against the energy security of remaining Member States 😉

@Ruth_Mottram

@t_mkdf @kravietz @Ruth_Mottram sounds like what is needed is leadership, spelling out why hardship maybe required perhaps after the rich are taxed more.
Though actually leadership in western democracies has been lacking for well past my 50 year lifetime.

@voron

Leadership assumes there’s some defined set of facts and values according to which someone is going to lead. In the world of postmodernism that dominated political philosophy of Western 20-21st century, the very concept of “fact” is questioned, not to mention “values”. As result, the facts and values of course are still there but are not discussed publicly, and leadership of course still happens, just not on the surface.

@t_mkdf @Ruth_Mottram

@kravietz @t_mkdf @Ruth_Mottram ahh so leadership is impossible got it.
Well let’s just say I disagree.

@voron

No, I’m just saying leadership is incompatible with postmodernism, not that it’s impossible or not necessary.

@t_mkdf @Ruth_Mottram

@t_mkdf @Ruth_Mottram @kravietz again, pasha what ever see above. All that is needed is someone to pound the table say:
Violent aggression bad.
Murder bad.
Sacrifice to prevent the above good, if your greed supercedes the above you are a bastard.
That’s leadership

@voron

That’s 100% my point - this “pounding the table” is fundamentally incompatible with the postmodernist nature of today’s political philosophy.

It applies equally to “left-wing” and “right-wing” movements, which is best illustrated by declaratively Christian activists “defending” religious organisations from investigations into child abuse, which is probably the most un-Christian crime out there. At the same time declaratively left-wing activists silence criticism of medieval “religious” practices as long as they are practised by minority groups, ignoring the fact they are as much contradictory with left-wing values as they can be.

And I’m not saying any of these is good thing or is desirable, I’m just stating a fact. 21st century Western popular politics became largely tribal, taking us back straight to pre-Enlightenment times. It starts with the idiotic divide into “left” and “right”, where everyone expects you to “pick a side”, meaning taking a whole bundle of both agreeable and utterly deranged postulates.

@t_mkdf @Ruth_Mottram

@kravietz @Ruth_Mottram @t_mkdf I understand what you are saying, although politics in essence is getting people to show up and mark a ballot. As we have seen demonstrated by Trump and others, that has less to do with what you are referring to, and more to do with mass marking/advertising principles.
Trumps “politics” is internally inconsistent when analyzing it as a political philosophy, however as a salesman it makes perfect sense and works.
So, 🤷‍♂️
@kravietz @t_mkdf @Ruth_Mottram As far as the tribal aspect goes I’m not sure I agree things were not tribal before the period you are referring too, it’s just one “tribe” was more dominant.
I mean when did women non whites etc gain political power in western democracies?
Setting that aside, I still disagree, Ukraine for example saw many Dems & gop come together in support even lobbying together, Elon crushed much of that as Twitter was a nexus
@Ruth_Mottram @kravietz @t_mkdf as far as values being so varied, I also disagree.
Violent aggression bad.
Murder bad.
Sacrifice to prevent the above good.

@voron

I can only agree with these, but then you have other people who come up and say “it’s actually OK to murder people if they come from another tribe” or “another religion” or “if they’re rich” or “if they had sex before marriage” or “engage with the same sex”.

And then you have postmodernists saying it’s not OK to tell these people “sorry, your values are incompatible with ours”, and telling that in such an aggressive way that makes any centre politician just avoid talking about this topic at all.

And this is precisely what makes centre parties gradually move towards… well, basically nihilism, while creating a political opportunity for populists like Jobbik, AfD, BNP etc.

I’m intentionally trying to avoid giving any specific examples as it would only distract us from the essence of the problem towards another tribal war ;)

@Ruth_Mottram @t_mkdf

@Ruth_Mottram @kravietz @t_mkdf I believe you are getting pretty far afield. Leadership starts by focusing people on A task and rallying them to it, not engaging in a broad ranging philosophical debate, that in a word is academic which is the opposite of leadership.

@voron @Ruth_Mottram @kravietz and back to the topic:

It's all in the view of regional, national and European interests in a web of dependencies.

So Ukraine might get the support from Germany and the EU that it needs. Polish security concerns will be taken more seriously. But Polish farmers might be thrown under the bus.

@t_mkdf

That “web of dependencies” sounds very much like an echo of Wandel durch Handel philosophy which failed us miserably in case of Russia 😉

Dependencies are good as long as they are formed between peers who share similar values. This is why strategic Russian gas or Chinese resources imports were harmful for EU, as they created a critical dependence on a business partner with much more predatory system of values than yours, so it’s not them who are undergoing Wandel as result of the exchange.

If a powerful EU player pushes to abandon or ease EU rules applying to existing producers in order to secure short-term profits for one of their own sectors, that undermines the whole point of EU existence as an economic cooperation framework 🤷

@voron @Ruth_Mottram

@t_mkdf @Ruth_Mottram @kravietz what failed us with Russia and with the whole neo liberalism is missing the trueism that sociopathy Increases with networth. So economic engagement was never the fuel for liberal democracy, it’s the other way around.
@t_mkdf @Ruth_Mottram @kravietz unelected concentrated power and wealth is what caused revolutions and democracies to form. Now we have unelected concentration of private wealth that is so great it has captured political and policy control
Same damn problem

@kravietz @Ruth_Mottram @voron web of dependencies is meant as a statement of fact.

As seen by German reliance on russian gas. Some node in the centre of the net made a certain decision. And the periphery suffered because of it.

And the periphery suffered regardless of the EU or not.

@t_mkdf

Exactly. And my point is that any aspiring “centres” should take care when making decisions because the consequence may be that they eventually become peripheries themselves :)

@Ruth_Mottram @voron

@kravietz @Ruth_Mottram @voron short term gains trump long term risks...;)
@kravietz @t_mkdf @Ruth_Mottram there is a damn war on the gates of Europe with whole cities destroyed. Russia as a nation is militarization not standing down. They are binding themselves to Iran & North Korea as well as China, what you are talking about can be chatted about in coffee shops by people in tweed jackets it’s not material to the leadership needed
@voron @kravietz @Ruth_Mottram positive example: German Minister of Defense Pistorius (Social Democrat) clearly stating that the Bundeswehr needs to be fit for war.
@t_mkdf @kravietz @Ruth_Mottram and as far as populists go, tax the hell out of the rich through some tax evading white collar criminals in prison and the politicians they bribe and the populists will be happy, btw that’s needed to sanction Russia etc effectively anyway

@kravietz @Ruth_Mottram I remember vividly.

And that's why I imagine that the concerns of CEE farmers will be heard and quickly discarded in view of the needs of Westphalian Piggy Barons.

@Ruth_Mottram @finestructure
Willing to pay it to BlackRock and Monsanto? Me? Not!