This has been years in the making, since around 2016 (!), and finally the paper has been published in #IJDH: "Repetitive research: a conceptual space and #terminology of #replication, #reproduction, revision, reanalysis, reinvestigation and reuse in digital humanities". See here: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42803-023-00073-y It's part of a collection on #reproducibility and #explainability in #DigitalHumanities: https://link.springer.com/collections/becggdhbad

#openscience #openaccess #theory #dh

Repetitive research: a conceptual space and terminology of replication, reproduction, revision, reanalysis, reinvestigation and reuse in digital humanities - International Journal of Digital Humanities

This article is motivated by the ‘reproducibility crisis’ that is being discussed intensely in fields such as Psychology or Biology but is also becoming increasingly relevant to Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing and Digital Humanities, not least in the context of Open Science. Using the phrase ‘repetitive research’ as an umbrella term for a range of practices from replication to follow-up research, and with the objective to provide clarity and help establish best practices in this area, this article focuses on two issues: First, the conceptual space of repetitive research is described across five key dimensions, namely those of the research question or hypothesis, the dataset, the method of analysis, the team, and the results or conclusions. Second, building on this new description of the conceptual space and on earlier terminological work, a specific set of terms for recurring scenarios of repetitive research is proposed. For each scenario, its position in the conceptual space is defined, its typical purpose and added value in the research process are discussed, the requirements for enabling it are described, and illustrative examples from the domain of Computational Literary Studies are provided. The key contribution of this article, therefore, is a proposal for a transparent terminology underpinned by a systematic model of the conceptual space of repetitive research.

SpringerLink

The key idea of the paper is to
(a) develop a simplified description of the conceptual space of repetitive research[1],
(b) to identify particular subspaces that describe recurrent practices of repeating research, and
(c) to provide convenient and distinct labels for each of them.

This forms the basis for discussing the requirements, usefulness and added value of each of these practices.

[1] I did not really find a better cover term that is not already in use for a more specific type.

@christof This is excellent, and probably immediately applicable to other fields as well (nothing inherently DH specific in the model, as far as I can see?)
@floe That's true, but the examples all come from Computational Literary Studies. Also, there is no strongly established terminological tradition in DH so it seems like the field might be more receptive to such a proposal than others where things are more established.
@christof given the confusion around "replication" vs. "reproduction" that was ongoing in CS until very recently (thanks, ACM), I don't think this should be a big issue. I might try and see if I can find some suitable examples from my own field of HCI, I'm really intrigued now 😁